Cited by 79Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Mobile crisis team intervention to enhance linkage of discharged suicidal emergency department patients to outpatient psychiatric services: a randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Currier, Glenn W., Fisher, Susan G., Caine, Eric D.·2010·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many suicidal patients treated and released from emergency departments (ED) fail to follow through with subsequent outpatient psychiatric appointments, often presenting back for repeat ED services. Thus, the authors sought to determine whether a mobile crisis team (MCT) intervention would be more effective than standard referral to a hospital-based clinic as a means of establishing near-term clinical contact after ED discharge. This objective was based on the premise that increased attendance at the first outpatient mental health appointment would initiate an ongoing treatment course, with subsequent differential improvements in psychiatric symptoms and functioning for patients successfully linked to care. METHODS: In a rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 120 participants who were evaluated for suicidal thoughts, plans, or behaviors, and who were subsequently discharged from an urban ED, were randomized to follow-up either in the community via a MCT or at an outpatient mental health clinic (OPC). Both MCTs and OPCs offered the same structured array of clinical services and referral options. RESULTS: Successful first clinical contact after ED discharge (here described as "linkage" to care) occurred in 39 of 56 (69.6%) participants randomized to the MCT versus 19 of 64 (29.6%) to the OPC (relative risk = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.55-3.56, p < 0.001). However, we detected no significant differences between groups using intention-to-treat analyses in symptom or functional outcome measures, at either 2 weeks or 3 months after enrollment. We also found no significant differences in outcomes between participants who did attend their first prescribed appointment via MCT or OPC versus those who did not. However divided (MCT vs. OPC, present at first appointment vs. no show), groups showed significant improvements but maintained clinically significant levels of dysfunction and continued to rely on ED services at a similar rate in the 6 months after study enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based mobile outreach was a highly effective method of contacting suicidal patients who were discharged from the ED. However, establishing initial postdischarge contact in the community versus the clinic did not prove more effective at enhancing symptomatic or functional outcomes, nor did successful linkage with outpatient psychiatric care. Overall, participants showed some improvement shortly after ED discharge regardless of outpatient clinical contact, but nonetheless remained significantly symptomatic and at risk for repeated ED presentations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00619.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Institute of Medicine The future of emergency care in the United States health system Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point Washington, DC National Academies Press 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Currier, G. W., Fisher, S. G., & Caine, E. D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Currier, Glenn W.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W1984656501
Cited by
79
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH071897, K23MH064517)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
mobile crisis teams, suicide, emergency department discharge, linkage to care, outpatient psychiatric care, post-discharge follow-up, community outreach, psychiatric referral, emergency department readmission, suicidal ideation
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Crisis Intervention, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Mobile Health Units, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Suicide, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review