The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW-AS A RULE
Abstract
Journal Article SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW—AS A RULE Get access Herbert G. Baker Herbert G. Baker Botany Department University of California Berkeley Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Evolution, Volume 21, Issue 4, 1 December 1967, Pages 853–856, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03440.x Published: 01 December 1967 Article history Received: 17 May 1967 Published: 01 December 1967
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SELF-COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG-DISTANCE” DISPERSAL
Baker, H. G. (1955) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1955.tb01544.x · Cited by 1,648
Self-citationSelf Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1957) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/281999 · Cited by 1,253
Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants
Lewis, D., & Crowe, L. K. (1958) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1958.26 · Cited by 389
Reproductive Methods as Factors in Speciation in Flowering Plants
Baker, H. G. (1959) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019 · Cited by 336
Self-citationTHE EXPERIMENTAL MODIFICATION OF SEX EXPRESSION IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Heslop-Harrison, J. S. (1957) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1957.tb01576.x · Cited by 260
The Biota of Long-Distance Dispersal. I. Principles of Dispersal and Evolution
Carlquist, S. (1966) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/405054 · Cited by 197
Multiple-allelomorph Incompatibility of Pollen and Style in the Evolution of the Angiosperms
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1950) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083243 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering Plants
Bawa, K. S. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311 · Cited by 961
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms
Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x · Cited by 538
Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences
Igic, B., Lande, R., & Kohn, J. R. (2008) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/523362 · Cited by 466
PHYLOGENIES AND THE ANALYSIS OF EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCES, WITH EXAMPLES FROM SEED PLANTS
Donoghue, M. J. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02565.x · Cited by 367
The Evolution and Maintenance of Androdioecy
Pannell, J. R. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150419 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, H. G.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1967-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 853-856
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313430569
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW-AS A RULE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03440.x
- The paper
- Baker, H. G. (1967). SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW-AS A RULE. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03440.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.