The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES OF COADAPTATION: PREFERRED TEMPERATURES VERSUS OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE TEMPERATURES OF LIZARDS
Abstract
The view that behavior and physiological performance are tightly coadapted is a central principle of physiological ecology. Here, we test this principle using a comparative study of evolutionary patterns in thermal preferences and the thermal dependence of sprinting in some Australian skinks (Lygosominae). Thermal preferences (Tp) differ strikingly among genera (range 24° to 35°C), but critical thermal maxima (CTMax) (range 38° to 45°C) and optimal temperatures for sprinting (To, 32° to 35°C) vary less. Diurnal genera have relatively high Tp, To, and CTMax. In contrast, nocturnal genera have low Tp but have moderate to high To and CTMax. Both nonphylogenetic and phylogenetic (minimum‐evolution) approaches suggest that coadaptation is tight only for genera with high Tp. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that low Tp and, thus, partial coadaptation are evolutionarily derived, indicating that low thermal preferences can evolve, even if this results in reduced performance. In one instance, thermal preferences and the thermal dependence of sprinting may have evolved in opposite directions, a phenomenon we call “antagonistic coadaptation.” We speculate on factors driving partial coadaptation and antagonistic coadaptation in these skinks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Cited by
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678
A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes
Pyron, R., Burbrink, F. T., & Wiens, J. J. (2013) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 · Cited by 1,641
Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution
Butler, M. A., & King, A. A. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/426002 · Cited by 1,438
Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation
Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · Cited by 1,238
Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies
PAGEL, M. (1997) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x · Cited by 1,106
Metadata
- Authors
- Huey, R. B., & Bennett, A. F.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1098-1115
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2031520521
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES OF COADAPTATION: PREFERRED TEMPERATURES VERSUS OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE TEMPERATURES OF LIZARDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05879.x
- The paper
- Huey, R. B., & Bennett, A. F. (1987). PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES OF COADAPTATION: PREFERRED TEMPERATURES VERSUS OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE TEMPERATURES OF LIZARDS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05879.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.