The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NOVEL COOPERATION EXPERIMENTALLY EVOLVED BETWEEN SPECIES
Open accessAbstract
Cooperation violates the view of "nature red in tooth and claw" that prevails in our understanding of evolution, yet examples of cooperation abound. Most work has focused on maintenance of cooperation within a single species through mechanisms such as kin selection. The factors necessary for the evolutionary origin of aiding unrelated individuals such as members of another species have not been experimentally tested. Here, I demonstrate that cooperation between species can be evolved in the laboratory if (1) there is preexisting reciprocation or feedback for cooperation, and (2) reciprocation is preferentially received by cooperative genotypes. I used a two species system involving Salmonella enterica ser. Typhimurium and an Escherichia coli mutant unable to synthesize an essential amino acid. In lactose media Salmonella consumes metabolic waste from E. coli, thus creating a mechanism of reciprocation for cooperation. Growth in a spatially structured environment assured that the benefits of cooperation were preferentially received by cooperative genotypes. Salmonella evolved to aid E. coli by excreting a costly amino acid, however this novel cooperation disappeared if the waste consumption or spatial structure were removed. This study builds on previous work to demonstrate an experimental origin of interspecific cooperation, and to test the factors necessary for such interactions to arise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889
Evolution Experiments with Microorganisms: The Dynamics and Genetic Bases of Adaptation
Elena, S. F., & Lenski, R. E. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1088 · Cited by 1,386
Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Buckling, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02744 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions
Kramer, J., Özkaya, Ö., & Kümmerli, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0284-4 · Cited by 998
Co-culture systems and technologies: taking synthetic biology to the next level
Goers, L., Freemont, P., & Polizzi, K. M. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0065 · Cited by 630
Production of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Systematic Review
Cui, Y., Miao, K., Niyaphorn, S., & Qu, X. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21030995 · Cited by 451
Zhang, L., Xu, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Hodge, A., & Feng, G. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13838 · Cited by 437
Trophic Interactions and the Drivers of Microbial Community Assembly
Gralka, M., Szabo, R., Stocker, R., & Cordero, O. X. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.007 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Harcombe, W.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2166-72
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2086655099
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 33.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NOVEL COOPERATION EXPERIMENTALLY EVOLVED BETWEEN SPECIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00959.x
- The paper
- Harcombe, W. (2010). NOVEL COOPERATION EXPERIMENTALLY EVOLVED BETWEEN SPECIES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00959.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.