Cited by 451GABA and Rice ResearchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Production of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Systematic Review

Open access
Cui, Yanhua, Miao, Kai, Niyaphorn, Siripitakyotin, Qu, Xiaojun·2020·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is widely distributed in nature and considered a potent bioactive compound with numerous and important physiological functions, such as anti-hypertensive and antidepressant activities. There is an ever-growing demand for GABA production in recent years. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are one of the most important GABA producers because of their food-grade nature and potential of producing GABA-rich functional foods directly. In this paper, the GABA-producing LAB species, the biosynthesis pathway of GABA by LAB, and the research progress of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), the key enzyme of GABA biosynthesis, were reviewed. Furthermore, GABA production enhancement strategies are reviewed, from optimization of culture conditions and genetic engineering to physiology-oriented engineering approaches and co-culture methods. The advances in both the molecular mechanisms of GABA biosynthesis and the technologies of synthetic biology and genetic engineering will promote GABA production of LAB to meet people’s demand for GABA. The aim of the review is to provide an insight of microbial engineering for improved production of GABA by LAB in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms21030995

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cui, Y., Miao, K., Niyaphorn, S., & Qu, X.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Cui, Yanhua
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
995
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004119871
Cited by
451
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 19 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471712 and 31371827)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › GABA and Rice Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
GABA, lactic acid bacteria, GABA synthesis, glutamic acid decarboxylase, microbial engineering, co-culture, culture condition optimization, functional foods, antihypertensive effect, antidepressant effects
MeSH terms
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Genetic Engineering, Lactobacillales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review