CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Jury Decision Making ProcessesPsychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relation of Cognitive and Memorial Processes to Persuasion in a Simulated Jury Trial

Calder, Bobby J., Insko, Chester A., Yandell, Ben·1974·Journal of Applied Social Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02808.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Four experiments investigated the dependence of persuasion on cognitive factors. All experiments employed a court case for which 795 subjects acted as jury members, reading summaries of both the prosecution and defense's testimony. The amount of objective information on both sides of the case was varied. Persuasion was a position function of the number of prosecution arguments and the number of defense arguments. This finding was extended by obtaining measures of the subjects’cognitive reactions to the case as well as their opinions and by following both of these measures over time. Both analysis of variance and multiple regression techniques showed that subjects could have derived their opinions from their cognitions about the case. This relationship also held up over time. These results suggest the general form of an information-processing theory of persuasion. One prediction of this theory is for an asymptotic function relating objective information to persuasion. This prediction received empirical support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02808.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blalock H. M., 1960, Social statistics
  2. Greenwald A. G., 1967, An amended learning model of persuasion
  3. McGuire W. J., 1968, Psychological foundations of attitudes
  4. Ostrom T. M., 1968, Psychological foundations of attitudes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Related

Metadata

Authors
Calder, B. J., Insko, C. A., & Yandell, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Calder, Bobby J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
62-93
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
DOI
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02808.x
OpenAlex
W2049703789
Cited by
139
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
18.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 15159 d)
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
persuasion, jury decision-making, cognitive processes, memory, objective information, attitude change over time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review