The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Desires, Self‐Predictions, and Perceived Control in the Prediction of Training Session Attendance1
Abstract
Employee attendance at a training session was examined using the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). In addition, based on Audi (1973a, b) and Warshaw and Davis (1985), a distinction was made between desires (I want) and behavioral self‐predictions (I will), and as in Ajzen (1985, 1987), the role of perceived control as a determinant of these desires, self‐predictions, and attendance behavior, per se, was investigated. The results indicated that the best predictors of attendance at the training session were one's desire or motivation to attend the training session and the extent to which one perceived pressure from his or her supervisor to do so. Consistent with the theory of reasoned action, the motivation to attend training was predicted accurately from attitudes and subjective norms (R=.76, p < .001). Moreover, these attitudes and subjective norms were themselves predicted from a consideration of behavioral and normative beliefs, and key beliefs underlying one's desire to attend were identified. However, a consideration of perceived control did not improve the prediction of one's desire to attend training, and neither perceived control nor behavioral self‐predictions improved prediction of actual attendance. The discussion focused on the roles of perceived control and different measures of intention in behavioral prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209170 · Cited by 3,867
Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843 · Cited by 1,024
Cited by
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250981 · Cited by 2,780
Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage
Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679204500702 · Cited by 894
Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use
Conner, M., & Mcmillan, B. (1999) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466699164121 · Cited by 364
Social determinants of food choice
Shepherd, R. (1999) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665199001093 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishbein, M., & Stasson, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 173-198
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2047177276
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Desires, Self‐Predictions, and Perceived Control in the Prediction of Training Session Attendance1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00406.x
- The paper
- Fishbein, M., & Stasson, M. (1990). The Role of Desires, Self‐Predictions, and Perceived Control in the Prediction of Training Session Attendance1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00406.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.