CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 670Social Robot Interaction and HRIMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices

Nass, Clifford, Moon, Youngme, Green, Nancy·1997·Journal of Applied Social Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study tested whether computers embedded with the most minimal gender cues will evoke gender‐based stereotypic responses. Using an experimental paradigm (N = 40) that involved computers with voice output, the study tested 3 gender‐based stereotypes under conditions in which all suggestions of gender were removed, with the sole exception of vocal cues. In all 3 cases, gender‐stereotypic responses were obtained. Because the experimental manipulation involved no deception regarding the source of the voices. this study presents evidence that the tendency to gender stereotype is extremely powerful, extending even to stereotyping of machines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pleck J. H., 1978, The psychology of women: Future directions in research
  2. Spence J. T., 1974, The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex‐role stereotypes and masculinity‐femininity, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–667 of 667

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Nass, Clifford
ORCID
Green, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-05
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
864-876
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
DOI
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x
OpenAlex
W2094409166
Cited by
670
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3378 d)
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
gender stereotypes, vocal cues, gender cues, speech output

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review