The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand‐Equity Perspective
Abstract
We extend the recruitment literature by examining how and why firms’ reputations affect job seekers, and by expanding the outcome variables that can be used to judge recruitment success. Results from 339 individuals suggested that job seekers’ reputation perceptions affected job pursuit because (a) individuals use reputation as a signal about job attributes, and (b) reputation affects the pride that individuals expect from organizational membership. Moreover, individuals were willing to pay a premium in the form of lower wages to join firms with positive reputations, and individuals’ familiarity with organizations affected the amount of information they could recall about a recruitment job posting after 1 week. Finally, the results suggested that reputation advertising did not affect job seekers’ reputation perceptions, suggesting that past research on fictitious companies may not generalize to actual organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies.
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.34.3.366 · Cited by 2,443
Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects
Janiszewski, C. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209356 · Cited by 455 · cited 1×
“encourages consumers to have a more favorable attitude toward the brand, even when the consumer cannot recollect the initial exposure (Janiszewski, 1993).”
Background
Cited by
Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001 · Cited by 2,279
Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective
Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2013) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x · Cited by 734
Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0848 · Cited by 722
Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1910-0 · Cited by 538
Characteristics of successful employer brands
Moroko, L., & Uncles, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2008.4 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2244-2266
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2150957793
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand‐Equity Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01883.x
- The paper
- Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand‐Equity Perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01883.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
