The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans, which controls Monilinia brown rot on apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit
Open accessAbstract
A biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans proved to be most effective in controlling brown rot on apple fruit when coinoculated into artificial wounds with a phytopathogenic isolate of Monilinia fructicola. Culture filtrates and autoclaved cells had no significant influence on the disease. When sprayed onto the apple fruit surface, this yeast formed a thin biofilm but failed to colonize the underlying tissues. When inoculated into wounds artificially inflicted to peach fruit or when sprayed onto the surface of peach fruit, the same strain showed an unexpected pathogenic behaviour, causing rapid decay of fruit tissues even in the absence of M. fructicola. Both optical and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the pattern of fruit tissue colonization by P. fermentans. While on apple surface and within the apple wound the antagonist retained its yeast-like shape, colonization of peach fruit tissue was always characterized by a transition from budding growth to pseudohyphal growth. These results suggest that pseudohyphal growth plays a major role in governing the potential pathogenicity of P. fermentans, further emphasizing the importance of a thorough risk assessment for the safe use of any novel biocontrol agent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits.
“Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans, etc.) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits [30, 96–101].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [97]
Based on the pathogenic behaviour of P. fermentans on peach fruit, the capability to differentiate hyphae and pseudohyphae under particular growth conditions has been proposed as a potential biohazard factor for biocontrol yeasts.
“Based on this “Jekyll & Hyde” pathogenic behaviour of P. fermentans on peach fruit, the capability to differentiate hyphae and pseudohyphae under particular growth conditions (e.g., depending on the nitrogen source) has been proposed as a potential biohazard factor for biocontrol yeasts (Giobbe et al. 2007).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Giobbe et al. 2007
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Chand-Goyal T & Spotts RA (1996) Postharvest biological control of blue mold of apple and brown rot of sweet cherry by natural saprophytic yeasts alone or in combination with low doses of fungicides. Biol Control 6: 253â259. · DOI
- Chandra J , Duncan M K , Mukherjee PK , Hoyer LI , McCormick T & Ghannoum MA (2001) Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol 183: 5385â5394. · DOI · Paper page
- Cook RJ , Bruckart WL , Coulson JR et al. (1996) Safety of microorganisms intended for pest and plant disease control: a framework for scientific evaluation. Biol Control 7: 333â351. · DOI
- Gognies S , Ait Barka E , Gainvors-Claisse A & Belarbi A (2006) Interactions between yeasts and grapevines: filamentous growth, endopolygalacturonase and phytopathogenicity of colonizing yeasts. Microbiol Ecol 51: 109â116. · DOI
- Gow NA , Brown AJ & Odds FC (2002) Fungal morphogenesis and host invasion. Curr Opin Microbiol 5: 366â371. · DOI · Paper page
- Hong CX , Michailides TJ & Holtz BA (1998) Effects of wounding, inoculum density, and biological control agents on postharvest brown rot of stone fruits. Plant Dis 82: 1210â1216. · DOI
- Janisiewicz WJ & Bors B (1995) Development of a microbial community of bacterial and yeast antagonists to control wound-invading postharvest pathogens of fruits. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 3261â3267. · DOI
- Janisiewicz WJ & Korsten L (2002) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40: 411â441. · DOI
- Jefferson KK (2004) What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 236: 163â173. · DOI
- Karabulut OA , Lurie S & Droby S (2001) Evaluation of the use of sodium bicarbonate, potassium sorbate and yeast antagonists for decreasing postharvest decay of sweet cherries. Postharvest Biol Technol 23: 233â236. · DOI
- Malandra L , Wolfaardt G , Zietsman A & Viljoen-Bloom M (2003) Microbiology of a biological contactor for winery wastewater treatment. Water Res 37: 4125â34. · DOI
- Michailides TJ , Luo Y , Ma Z & Morgan DP (2007) Brown rot of dried plum in California: new insights on an old disease. APSnet Feature Story March 2007. http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/prune/ · DOI
- Phaff HJ , Miranda M , Starmer WT , Tredick J & Barker JSF (1986) Clavispora opuntiae, a new heterothallic yeast occurring in necrotic tissue of Opuntia species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36: 372â379. · DOI
- Restuccia C , Giusino F , Licciardello F , Randazzo C , Caggia C & Muratore G (2006) Biological control of peach fungal pathogens by commercial products and indigenous yeasts. J Food Prot 69: 2465â2470. · DOI · Paper page
- Sherman, 1986, Methods in Yeast Genetics
- Spadaro D , Vola R , Piano S & Gullino ML (2002) Mechanisms of action and efficacy of four isolates of the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima active against postharvest pathogens on apples. Postharvest Biol Technol 24: 123â134. · DOI · Paper page
- Spotts RA , Cervantes LA , Facteau TJ & Chand-Goyal T (1998) Control of brown rot and blue mold of sweet cherry with preharvest iprodione, postharvest Cryptococcus infirmo-miniatus, and modified atmosphere packaging. Plant Dis 82: 1158â1160. · DOI
- Starmer WT , Phaff HJ , Miranda M & Miller MW (1978) Pichia cactophila, a new species of yeast found in decaying tissue of cacti. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28: 318â325. · DOI
- Sudbery P , Gow N & Berman J (2004) The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 12: 317â324. · DOI · Paper page
- Tian S , Qin G & Xu Y (2004) Survival of antagonistic yeasts under field conditions and their biocontrol ability against postharvest diseases of sweet cherry. Postharvest Biol Technol 33: 327â331. · DOI
- Verstrepen KJ & Klis FM (2006) Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol Microbiol 60: 5â15. · DOI · Paper page
- Wittig HPP , Johnson KB & Pscheidt JW (1997) Effect of epiphytic fungi on brown rot blossom blight and latent infections in sweet cherry. Plant Dis 81: 383â387. · DOI
- Zara S , Bakalinsky AT , Zara G , Pirino G , Demontis MA & Budroni M (2005) FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 2934â2939. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758
Spadaro, D., & Droby, S. (2016) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003 · Cited by 732
Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications
Freimoser, F. M., Rueda-Mejia, M. P., Tilocca, B., & Migheli, Q. (2019) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-019-2728-4 · Cited by 462
Self-citationMukherjee, P. K., Chandra, J., Retuerto, M., Sikaroodi, M., Brown, R. E., Jurevic, R., Salata, R. A., Lederman, M. M., Gillevet, P. M., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003996 · Cited by 337
Hilber-Bodmer, M., Schmid, M., Ahrens, C. H., & Freimoser, F. M. (2017) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0908-z · Cited by 106
Konsue, W., Dethoup, T., & Limtong, S. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8030317 · Cited by 106
Cubaiu, L., Abbas, H., Dobson, A., Budroni, M., & Migheli, Q. (2012) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins4121468 · Cited by 53
“According to related pathosystems, other possible mechanisms may include biofilm formation on the wound surface [26], the inhibition of fungal secondary metabolism [27], the production of antifungal enzymes [28] or the induction of resistance in the fruit tissues [12,29].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Giobbe, S., Marceddu, S., Scherm, B., Zara, G., Mazzarello, V. L., Budroni, M., & Migheli, Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Sassari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Migheli, Quirico
- ORCID
- Venue
- FEMS Yeast Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1389-1398
- ISSN
- 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
- 1567-1364
- OpenAlex
- W2138697738
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- Pichia fermentans, Monilinia fructicola, brown rot, apple, peach fruit, biofilm, biological control, antagonistic yeasts, pathogenicity, pseudohyphal growth, co-inoculation, risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Antibiosis, Ascomycota, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Molecular Sequence Data, Pichia, Plant Diseases, Biofilms, Malus, Prunus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review