Cited by 83Yeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans, which controls Monilinia brown rot on apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit

Open access

Abstract

A biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans proved to be most effective in controlling brown rot on apple fruit when coinoculated into artificial wounds with a phytopathogenic isolate of Monilinia fructicola. Culture filtrates and autoclaved cells had no significant influence on the disease. When sprayed onto the apple fruit surface, this yeast formed a thin biofilm but failed to colonize the underlying tissues. When inoculated into wounds artificially inflicted to peach fruit or when sprayed onto the surface of peach fruit, the same strain showed an unexpected pathogenic behaviour, causing rapid decay of fruit tissues even in the absence of M. fructicola. Both optical and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the pattern of fruit tissue colonization by P. fermentans. While on apple surface and within the apple wound the antagonist retained its yeast-like shape, colonization of peach fruit tissue was always characterized by a transition from budding growth to pseudohyphal growth. These results suggest that pseudohyphal growth plays a major role in governing the potential pathogenicity of P. fermentans, further emphasizing the importance of a thorough risk assessment for the safe use of any novel biocontrol agent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00301.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits.

    “Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans, etc.) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits [30, 96–101].”
  • Based on the pathogenic behaviour of P. fermentans on peach fruit, the capability to differentiate hyphae and pseudohyphae under particular growth conditions has been proposed as a potential biohazard factor for biocontrol yeasts.

    “Based on this “Jekyll & Hyde” pathogenic behaviour of P. fermentans on peach fruit, the capability to differentiate hyphae and pseudohyphae under particular growth conditions (e.g., depending on the nitrogen source) has been proposed as a potential biohazard factor for biocontrol yeasts (Giobbe et al. 2007).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Giobbe et al. 2007

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Chand-Goyal T & Spotts RA (1996) Postharvest biological control of blue mold of apple and brown rot of sweet cherry by natural saprophytic yeasts alone or in combination with low doses of fungicides. Biol Control 6: 253–259. · DOI
  2. Chandra J , Duncan M K , Mukherjee PK , Hoyer LI , McCormick T & Ghannoum MA (2001) Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol 183: 5385–5394. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cook RJ , Bruckart WL , Coulson JR et al. (1996) Safety of microorganisms intended for pest and plant disease control: a framework for scientific evaluation. Biol Control 7: 333–351. · DOI
  4. Gognies S , Ait Barka E , Gainvors-Claisse A & Belarbi A (2006) Interactions between yeasts and grapevines: filamentous growth, endopolygalacturonase and phytopathogenicity of colonizing yeasts. Microbiol Ecol 51: 109–116. · DOI
  5. Gow NA , Brown AJ & Odds FC (2002) Fungal morphogenesis and host invasion. Curr Opin Microbiol 5: 366–371. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hong CX , Michailides TJ & Holtz BA (1998) Effects of wounding, inoculum density, and biological control agents on postharvest brown rot of stone fruits. Plant Dis 82: 1210–1216. · DOI
  7. Janisiewicz WJ & Bors B (1995) Development of a microbial community of bacterial and yeast antagonists to control wound-invading postharvest pathogens of fruits. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 3261–3267. · DOI
  8. Janisiewicz WJ & Korsten L (2002) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40: 411–441. · DOI
  9. Jefferson KK (2004) What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 236: 163–173. · DOI
  10. Karabulut OA , Lurie S & Droby S (2001) Evaluation of the use of sodium bicarbonate, potassium sorbate and yeast antagonists for decreasing postharvest decay of sweet cherries. Postharvest Biol Technol 23: 233–236. · DOI
  11. Malandra L , Wolfaardt G , Zietsman A & Viljoen-Bloom M (2003) Microbiology of a biological contactor for winery wastewater treatment. Water Res 37: 4125–34. · DOI
  12. Michailides TJ , Luo Y , Ma Z & Morgan DP (2007) Brown rot of dried plum in California: new insights on an old disease. APSnet Feature Story March 2007. http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/prune/ · DOI
  13. Phaff HJ , Miranda M , Starmer WT , Tredick J & Barker JSF (1986) Clavispora opuntiae, a new heterothallic yeast occurring in necrotic tissue of Opuntia species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36: 372–379. · DOI
  14. Restuccia C , Giusino F , Licciardello F , Randazzo C , Caggia C & Muratore G (2006) Biological control of peach fungal pathogens by commercial products and indigenous yeasts. J Food Prot 69: 2465–2470. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sherman, 1986, Methods in Yeast Genetics
  16. Spadaro D , Vola R , Piano S & Gullino ML (2002) Mechanisms of action and efficacy of four isolates of the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima active against postharvest pathogens on apples. Postharvest Biol Technol 24: 123–134. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Spotts RA , Cervantes LA , Facteau TJ & Chand-Goyal T (1998) Control of brown rot and blue mold of sweet cherry with preharvest iprodione, postharvest Cryptococcus infirmo-miniatus, and modified atmosphere packaging. Plant Dis 82: 1158–1160. · DOI
  18. Starmer WT , Phaff HJ , Miranda M & Miller MW (1978) Pichia cactophila, a new species of yeast found in decaying tissue of cacti. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28: 318–325. · DOI
  19. Sudbery P , Gow N & Berman J (2004) The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 12: 317–324. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tian S , Qin G & Xu Y (2004) Survival of antagonistic yeasts under field conditions and their biocontrol ability against postharvest diseases of sweet cherry. Postharvest Biol Technol 33: 327–331. · DOI
  21. Verstrepen KJ & Klis FM (2006) Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol Microbiol 60: 5–15. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wittig HPP , Johnson KB & Pscheidt JW (1997) Effect of epiphytic fungi on brown rot blossom blight and latent infections in sweet cherry. Plant Dis 81: 383–387. · DOI
  23. Zara S , Bakalinsky AT , Zara G , Pirino G , Demontis MA & Budroni M (2005) FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 2934–2939. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Giobbe, S., Marceddu, S., Scherm, B., Zara, G., Mazzarello, V. L., Budroni, M., & Migheli, Q.
Affiliations
University of Sassari (IT)
Corresponding author
Migheli, Quirico
Venue
FEMS Yeast Research
Published
2007-12
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
1389-1398
ISSN
  • 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1567-1364
OpenAlex
W2138697738
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Pichia fermentans, Monilinia fructicola, brown rot, apple, peach fruit, biofilm, biological control, antagonistic yeasts, pathogenicity, pseudohyphal growth, co-inoculation, risk assessment
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Ascomycota, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Molecular Sequence Data, Pichia, Plant Diseases, Biofilms, Malus, Prunus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review