Cited by 41Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlAnimal Behavior and ReproductionLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy

Effects of larval starvation and adult diet‐derived amino acids on reproduction in a fruit‐feeding butterfly

Open access
Bauerfeind, Stephanie S., Fischer, Klaus·2009·Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Abstract

Availability of adequate nutrition is among the most important factors affecting growth, development, and reproduction in animals. In holometabolous insects, diets and nutritional needs change between life stages, with larval storage, and adult feeding and reproduction being linked to one another. In several butterfly species, adult feeding is of fundamental importance to realize the full reproductive potential, primarily due to a prominent role of adult diet‐derived carbohydrates. In contrast, the role of adult diet‐derived amino acids is still under debate, despite the fact that butterflies were often found to preferentially feed on amino acid‐rich substrates. Recently it was found that amino acids from adult income could compensate for adverse effects of larval food quality. In our study on the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), we used larval starvation to investigate corresponding effects on female reproductive output. Short periods of larval starvation prolonged development time and reduced larval survival, larval growth rate, pupal mass, and egg size. Regardless of the degree of larval starvation, access to amino acids in the adult diet increased egg size, whereas egg number remained largely unaffected. Thus, although there was some evidence for adult diet‐derived amino acids being overall beneficial to reproduction, there was no indication that they can compensate for larval starvation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00814.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauerfeind, S. S., & Fischer, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
Bauerfeind, Stephanie S.
Venue
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-09
Volume
130
Issue
3
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 0013-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-7458
OpenAlex
W2088205997
Cited by
40
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Keywords
larval starvation, female reproductive output, egg size, egg number, Bicyclus anynana, Nymphalidae, larval food quality, development time, larval survival, pupal weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review