Cited by 371Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Epidemiology and health care seeking in the functional GI disorders: a population-based study

Koloski, Natasha A., Talley, Nicholas J., Boyce, Philip M.·2002·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Functional GI disorders (FGIDs) are common in clinical practice, but little is known about the epidemiology of these disorders in the general population. We aimed to determine the prevalence, association with psychological morbidity, and health care seeking behavior of FGIDs in the population. METHODS: A random sample of subjects (n = 4500) aged > or = 18 yr and representative of the Australian population were mailed a validated questionnaire. For these subjects we measured all Rome I GI symptoms and physician visits over the past 12 months, as well as neuroticism, anxiety, depression, and somatic distress. RESULTS: The response rate for the study was 72%. The prevalence of any FGID was 34.6%, and 62.1% of these subjects had consulted a physician. There was considerable overlap of the FGIDs (19.2% had more than two disorders). Independent predictors for an FGID diagnosis were neuroticism, somatic distress, anxiety, bowel habit disturbance, abdominal pain frequency, and increasing age. However, psychological morbidity did not independently discriminate between consulters and nonconsulters with an FGID. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of the general population have one or more FGIDs. There seems to be a modest link between psychological morbidity and FGIDs, although other unknown factors seem to be more important in explaining health care seeking for these disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05783.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koloski, N. A., Talley, N. J., & Boyce, P. M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2002-09
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
2290-2299
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2081132041
Cited by
371
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
functional gastrointestinal disorders, prevalence, health-seeking behavior, psychological morbidity, neuroticism, anxiety, depression, somatic distress, Rome I criteria, physician visits, abdominal pain, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review