Cited by 6Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Early adoption, experience, and farm performance of GM corn seeds

Aldana, Ursula, Barham, Brad, Foltz, Jeremy, Useche, Pilar·2012·Agricultural Economics

Abstract

The current article explores the characteristics that distinguish early from late adopters of GM corn and measures the productivity impacts of early adoption, for a sample of farmers in Minnesota and Wisconsin. The results of the adoption analysis confirm that size, education as well as specialization are positively correlated with early adoption. In addition, these results also show that farms that are mostly worked by family labor but hire some off‐farm labor are more likely to adopt GM seeds earlier in the diffusion process. The productivity analysis demonstrates the superiority of stacked varieties. At the same time, we find no evidence of a direct impact of experience on yields. Given the previously documented impact of early adoption on the use of stacked varieties, we conclude that experience plays a role through the adoption of these new technologies but does not play a role in allowing the producer to use the technology more efficiently, once it has been adopted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00616.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1093/ajae/aaq112 · DOI
  2. Alexander C., 2001, Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods
  3. 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0304-3878(94)00049-I · DOI
  5. Below F.E. Uribelarrea M. Ruffo M. Moose S.P. Becker A.W. 2007.Triple‐stacks Genetics and Biotechnology in improving Nitrogen use of Corn.Proceedings of the North Central Extension‐Industry Soil Fertility Conference. Vol.23 5–13. Available at:http://extension.agron.iastate.edu/nce/ncepdfs/2007/nc2007‐p5‐below.pdf accessed August 2012.
  6. Besley T., 1994, Diffusion as a learning process: Evidence from HYV Cotton. Research program in development studies. Center of International Studies
  7. 10.1257/aer.100.1.35 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1086/451461 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fernandez Cornejo J., 2001, Decomposing the size effect on the adoption of innovations: Agrobiotechnology and precision agriculture, Agbioforum, 4, 124
  10. Fernandez Cornejo J., 2000, Genetically engineered crops for pest management in U.S. Agricultura: Farm level effects
  11. 10.1086/601447 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Marra M., 2010, The Anticipated Value of SmartStax for US Corn Growers, AgBioForum, 13, 1
  13. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/ajae/aaq063 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2134/agronj2005.0144 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01236.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Aldana, U., Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Useche, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
43
Issue
s1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
  • 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-0862
OpenAlex
W2158539626
Cited by
6
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
transgenic maize, technology adoption, early adopters, diffusion of innovations, agricultural productivity, farming experience, farm size, farmer education, agricultural specialization, family farm labor, off-farm employment, maize yield, Minnesota, Wisconsin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early adoption, experience, and farm performance of GM corn seeds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00616.x
The paper
Aldana, U., Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Useche, P. (2012). Early adoption, experience, and farm performance of GM corn seeds. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00616.x