Cited by 798Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural Economics and PracticesInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution

Munshi, Kaivan·2004·Journal of Development Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.03.003

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munshi, K.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Munshi, Kaivan
Venue
Journal of Development Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
185-213
ISSN
0304-3878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163220282
Cited by
798
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 44
FWCI
62.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Development Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
social learning, technology diffusion, heterogeneous populations, wheat, rice, unobserved heterogeneity, information flow, local experimentation, agricultural technology adoption, growth conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review