The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes: Status of microbial census in rumen
Abstract
In this study, the collective microbial diversity in the rumen was examined by performing a meta-analysis of all the curated 16S rRNA gene (rrn) sequences deposited in the RDP database. As of November 2010, 13,478 bacterial and 3516 archaeal rrn sequences were found. The bacterial sequences were assigned to 5271 operation taxonomic units (OTUs) at species level (0.03 phylogenetic distance) representing 19 existing phyla, of which the Firmicutes (2958 OTUs), Bacteroidetes (1610 OTUs) and Proteobacteria (226 OTUs) were the most predominant. These bacterial sequences were grouped into more than 3500 OTUs at genus level (0.05 distance), but only 180 existing genera were represented. Nearly all the archaeal sequences were assigned to 943 species-level OTUs in phylum Euryarchaeota. Although clustered into 670 genus-level OTUs, only 12 existing archaeal genera were represented. Based on rarefaction analysis, the current percent coverage at species level reached 71% for bacteria and 65% for archaea. At least 78,218 bacterial and 24,480 archaeal sequences would be needed to reach 99.9% coverage. The results of this study may serve as a framework to assess the significance of individual populations to rumen functions and to guide future studies to identify the alpha and global diversity of ruminal microbiomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation
Calsamiglia, S., Busquet, M., Cardozo, P. W., Castillejos, L., & Ferret, A. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-644 · Cited by 1,014
Cited by
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., Young, W., Collaborators, G. R. C., Abecia, L., Angarita, E., Aravena, P., Nora Arenas, G., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14567 · Cited by 1,682
Knapp, J. R., Laur, G. L., Vadas, P. A., Weiss, W. P., & Tricarico, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7234 · Cited by 1,002
Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection
Hungate1000 project collaborators, Seshadri, R., Leahy, S. C., Attwood, G. T., Teh, K. H., Lambie, S. C., Cookson, A. L., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Hadjithomas, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4110 · Cited by 624
Composition and Similarity of Bovine Rumen Microbiota across Individual Animals
Jami, E., & Mizrahi, I. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033306 · Cited by 573
Mao, S., Zhang, M., Liu, J., & Zhu, W. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16116 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, M., Morrison, M., & Yu, Z.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-12
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-63
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1556124044
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes: Status of microbial census in rumen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x
- The paper
- Kim, M., Morrison, M., & Yu, Z. (2011). Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes: Status of microbial census in rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.