Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biofilms in chronic infections – a matter of opportunity – monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections

Burmølle, Mette, Thomsen, Trine Rolighed, Fazli, Mustafa, Dige, Irene, Christensen, Lise, Homøe, Preben, Tvede, Michael, Nyvad, Bente, Tolker-Nielsen, Tim, Givskov, Michael, Moser, Claus, Kirketerp-Møller, Klaus, Johansen, Helle Krogh, Høiby, Niels, Jensen, Peter Østrup, Sørensen, Søren J., Bjarnsholt, Thomas·2010·FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology

Abstract

It has become evident that aggregation or biofilm formation is an important survival mechanism for bacteria in almost any environment. In this review, we summarize recent visualizations of bacterial aggregates in several chronic infections (chronic otitis media, cystic fibrosis, infection due to permanent tissue fillers and chronic wounds) both as to distribution (such as where in the wound bed) and organization (monospecies or multispecies microcolonies). We correlate these biofilm observations to observations of commensal biofilms (dental and intestine) and biofilms in natural ecosystems (soil). The observations of the chronic biofilm infections point toward a trend of low bacterial diversity and sovereign monospecies biofilm aggregates even though the infection in which they reside are multispecies. In contrast to this, commensal and natural biofilm aggregates contain multiple species that are believed to coexist, interact and form biofilms with high bacterial and niche diversity. We discuss these differences from both the diagnostic and the scientific point of view.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-695x.2010.00714.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Burmølle, M., Thomsen, T. R., Fazli, M., Dige, I., Christensen, L., Homøe, P., Tvede, M., Nyvad, B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Givskov, M., Moser, C., Kirketerp-Møller, K., Johansen, H. K., Høiby, N., Jensen, P. Ø., Sørensen, S. J., & Bjarnsholt, T.
Venue
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
Published
2010-08
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
324-336
ISSN
  • 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-695X
OpenAlex
W1940390013
Cited by
427
References
5
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilms in chronic infections – a matter of opportunity – monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2010.00714.x
The paper
Burmølle, M., Thomsen, T. R., Fazli, M., Dige, I., Christensen, L., Homøe, P., Tvede, M., Nyvad, B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Givskov, M., Moser, C., Kirketerp-Møller, K., Johansen, H. K., Høiby, N., Jensen, P. Ø., Sørensen, S. J., & Bjarnsholt, T. (2010). Biofilms in chronic infections – a matter of opportunity – monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2010.00714.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.