The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction for diagnostic applications
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the robustness of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of DNA for bacterial diagnostic applications. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi was used as the target organism and compared with a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for testing assay performance and reproducibly, as well as the impact of pH and temperature stability. This isothermal amplification method appeared to be particularly robust across 2 pH units (7.3-9.3) and temperature values (57-67 °C). The detection limit was comparable to that observed using optimized home-brew qPCR assays. The specificity of the amplification reaction remained high even at temperatures markedly different from the optimal one. Exposing reagents to the ambient temperature during the preparation of the reaction mixture as well as prolonging times for preparing the amplification reaction did not yield false-positive results. LAMP remained sensitive and specific despite the addition of untreated biological fluids such as stool or urine that commonly inhibit PCR amplification. Whereas the detection of microorganisms from whole blood or a blood-culture medium typically requires extensive sample purification and removal of inhibitors, LAMP amplification remained more sensitive than conventional qPCR when omitting such preparatory steps. Our results demonstrate that LAMP is not only easy to use, but is also a very robust, innovative and powerful molecular diagnostic method for both industrialized and developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing
Goldenberger, D., Künzli, A., Vogt, P., Zbinden, R., & Altwegg, M. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.11.2733-2739.1997 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Becherer, L., Borst, N., Bakheit, M., Frischmann, S., Zengerle, R., & von Stetten, F. (2020) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c9ay02246e · Cited by 429
Lamb, L. E., Bartolone, S. N., Ward, E., & Chancellor, M. B. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234682 · Cited by 348
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification methods for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis
Seki, M., Kilgore, P. E., Kim, E. J., Ohnishi, M., Hayakawa, S., & Kim, D. W. (2018) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2018.00057 · Cited by 60
Kim, D. W., Kilgore, P. E., Kim, E. J., Kim, S. A., Anh, D. D., & Seki, M. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00515-11 · Cited by 50
Kim, D. W., Kilgore, P. E., Kim, E. J., Kim, S. A., Anh, D. D., Dong, B. Q., Kim, J. S., & Seki, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042954 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Francois, P., Tangomo, M., Hibbs, J., Bonetti, E.-J., Boehme, C. C., Notomi, T., Perkins, M. D., & Schrenzel, J.
- Venue
- FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-48
- ISSN
- 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-695X
- OpenAlex
- W1896186489
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction for diagnostic applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2011.00785.x
- The paper
- Francois, P., Tangomo, M., Hibbs, J., Bonetti, E.-J., Boehme, C. C., Notomi, T., Perkins, M. D., & Schrenzel, J. (2011). Robustness of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction for diagnostic applications. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2011.00785.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.