Cited by 50Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBacterial Infections and VaccinesBiosensors and Analytical Detection

The Enhanced Pneumococcal LAMP Assay: A Clinical Tool for the Diagnosis of Meningitis Due to Streptococcus pneumoniae

Open access
Kim, Dong Wook, Kilgore, Paul E., Kim, Eun Jin, Kim, Soon Ae, Anh, Dang Duc, Dong, Bai Qing, Kim, Jung Soo, Seki, Mitsuko·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of invasive bacterial disease in developed and developing countries. We studied the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique to assess its suitability for detecting S. pneumoniae nucleic acid in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We established an improved LAMP assay targeting the lytA gene (Streptococcus pneumoniae [Sp] LAMP). The analytical specificity of the primers was validated by using 32 reference strains (10 Streptococcus and seven non-Streptococcus species) plus 25 clinical alpha-hemolytic streptococcal strains, including four S. pneumoniae strains and 21 other strains (3 S. oralis, 17 S. mitis, and one Streptococcus species) harboring virulence factor-encoding genes (lytA or ply). Within 30 minutes, the assay could detect as few as 10 copies of both purified DNA and spiked CSF specimens with greater sensitivity than conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The linear determination range for this assay is 10 to 1,000,000 microorganisms per reaction mixture using real-time turbidimetry. We evaluated the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Sp LAMP assay using 106 randomly selected CSF specimens from children with suspected meningitis in Korea, China and Vietnam. For comparison, CSF specimens were also tested against conventional PCR and culture tests. The detection rate of the LAMP method was substantially higher than the rates of PCR and culture tests. In this small sample, relative to the LAMP assay, the clinical sensitivity of PCR and culture tests was 54.5% and 33.3%, respectively, while clinical specificity of the two tests was 100%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared to PCR, Sp LAMP detected S. pneumoniae with higher analytical and clinical sensitivity. This specific and sensitive LAMP method offers significant advantages for screening patients on a population basis and for diagnosis in clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0042954

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reported sensitivity of PCR for pneumococcal meningitis is high and reached 100% in the majority of studies, with a median of 100% and range 79%-100%.

    “The reported sensitivity of PCR for pneumococcal meningitis is high and reached 100% in the majority of conducted studies (median of 100%, range 79%–100%) (Table 1; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material) (49–58).”

    From Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results and Discussion (Sp LAMP and Sp PCR Analysis of CSF Specimens; page unavailable) report PCR clinical sensitivity of 54.5% relative to LAMP, below the claimed 79%–100% range. The paper's 100% figure refers to PCR specificity; it also notes that PCR detected every culture-positive specimen, but does not report 100% overall clinical sensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D. W., Kilgore, P. E., Kim, E. J., Kim, S. A., Anh, D. D., Dong, B. Q., Kim, J. S., & Seki, M.
Affiliations
  • International Vaccine Institute (KR)
  • Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
  • Guangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CN)
  • Jeonbuk National University (KR)
  • Nihon University (JP)
Corresponding author
Seki, Mitsuko
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-08-10
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e42954
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053220097
Cited by
50
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Human Biology (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Nihon University
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Hanyang University (HY-2011, HY-2011-N)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
Streptococcus pneumoniae, pneumococcal meningitis, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, lytA gene, cerebrospinal fluid, rapid molecular diagnostics, sensitivity and specificity, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, invasive pneumococcal disease
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, DNA, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, Infant, Meningitis, Pneumococcal, N-Acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine Amidase, Sensitivity and Specificity, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Reproducibility of Results, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review