Cited by 323Fungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Horizontal gene transfer in fungi

Fitzpatrick, David A.·2012·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is frequently observed in prokaryotes and until recently was assumed to be of limited importance to eukaryotes. However, there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that HGT is an important mechanism in eukaryotic genome evolution, particularly in unicellular organisms. The transfer of individual genes, gene clusters or entire chromosomes can have significant impacts on niche specification, disease emergence or shift in metabolic capabilities. In terms of genomic sequencing, the fungal kingdom is one of the most densely sampled eukaryotic lineages and is at the forefront of eukaryote comparative genomics and enables us to use fungi to study eukaryotic evolutionary mechanisms including HGT. This review describes the bioinformatics-based methodologies commonly used to locate HGT in fungal genomes and investigates the possible mechanisms involved in transferring genetic material laterally into fungal species. I will highlight a number of fungal HGT events and discuss the impact they have played on fungal evolution and discuss the implications HGT may have on the fungal tree of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02465.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Horizontal gene transfer is significantly less frequent in yeasts than in prokaryotes due to their more complex genome organisation.

    “horizontal gene transfer, albeit occurring more frequently in fungi than thought earlier, is significantly less frequent in yeasts, as compared to their prokaryotic counterparts, due to their more complex genome organisation (Fitzpatrick 2012; Moriguchi et al. 2013; Richards et al. 2011).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Fitzpatrick 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzpatrick, D. A.
Affiliations
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Fitzpatrick, David A.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
329
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076397859
Cited by
323
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Board
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
horizontal gene transfer, fungi, eukaryotic genome evolution, fungal evolution, gene transfer mechanisms, comparative genomics
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Fungi, Genes, Fungal, Recombination, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Gene Transfer, Horizontal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review