The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology
Open accessAbstract
Until recently, microbial identification in clinical diagnostic laboratories has mainly relied on conventional phenotypic and gene sequencing identification techniques. The development of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) devices has revolutionized the routine identification of microorganisms in clinical microbiology laboratories by introducing an easy, rapid, high throughput, low-cost, and efficient identification technique. This technology has been adapted to the constraint of clinical diagnostic laboratories and has the potential to replace and/or complement conventional identification techniques for both bacterial and fungal strains. Using standardized procedures, the resolution of MALDI-TOF MS allows accurate identification at the species level of most Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains with the exception of a few difficult strains that require more attention and further development of the method. Similarly, the routine identification by MALDI-TOF MS of yeast isolates is reliable and much quicker than conventional techniques. Recent studies have shown that MALDI-TOF MS has also the potential to accurately identify filamentous fungi and dermatophytes, providing that specific standardized procedures are established for these microorganisms. Moreover, MALDI-TOF MS has been used successfully for microbial typing and identification at the subspecies level, demonstrating that this technology is a potential efficient tool for epidemiological studies and for taxonomical classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Seng, P., Drancourt, M., Gouriet, F., La Scola, B., Fournier, P., Rolain, J. M., & Raoult, D. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600885 · Cited by 1,983 · cited 12×
“Seng et al. (2009) showed that an improved database is required as 50% of the total isolates (46) showing no identification by MALDI-TOF MS were anaerobic bacteria including Fusobacterium nucleatum and non-Clostridium anaerobes that had no reference in the Bruker database.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Cited by
The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention.
Roca, I., Akova, M., Baquero, F., Carlet, J., Cavaleri, M., Coenen, S., Cohen, J., Findlay, D., Gyssens, I., Heure, O. E., et al. (2015) · New Microbes and New Infections · doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2015.02.007 · Cited by 1,106
Can MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Reasonably Type Bacteria?
Sauget, M., Valot, B., Bertrand, X., & Hocquet, D. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.006 · Cited by 214
Methods for Rapid Diagnosis of Meningitis Etiology in Adults
Poplin, V., Boulware, D. R., & Bahr, N. C. (2020) · Biomarkers in Medicine · doi:10.2217/bmm-2019-0333 · Cited by 119
Electrochemical detection of single E. coli bacteria labeled with silver nanoparticles
Sepunaru, L., Tschulik, K., Batchelor-McAuley, C., Gavish, R., & Compton, R. G. (2015) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c5bm00114e · Cited by 116
Biomedical Mass Spectrometry in Today's and Tomorrow's Clinical Microbiology Laboratories
van Belkum, A., Welker, M., Erhard, M., & Chatellier, S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00420-12 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Croxatto, A., Prod'hom, G., & Greub, G.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 380-407
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2115445096
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00298.x
- The paper
- Croxatto, A., Prod'hom, G., & Greub, G. (2012). Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00298.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.