The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concepts of scaffold‐based tissue engineering—the rationale to use solid free‐form fabrication techniques
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Scaffolds for bone engineering fabricated by solid free‐form fabrication Scaffolds combined with growth factors and other biologically active molecules Accelerated bone repair with growth factors, HS and HS‐like molecules Conclusion A paradigm shift is taking place in orthopaedic and reconstructive surgery from using medical devices and tissue grafts to a tissue engineering approach that uses biodegradable scaffolds combined with cells or biological molecules to repair and/or regenerate tissues. One of the potential benefits offered by solid free‐form fabrication technology (SFF) is the ability to create scaffolds with highly reproducible architecture and compositional variation across the entire scaffold, due to its tightly controlled computer‐driven fabrication. In this review, we define scaffold properties and attempt to provide some broad criteria and constraints for scaffold design in bone engineering.We also discuss the application‐specific modifications driven by surgeon's requirements in vitro and/or in vivo. Next, we review the current use of SFF techniques in scaffold fabrication in the context of their clinical use in bone regeneration. Lastly, we comment on future developments in our groups, such as the functionalization of novel composite scaffolds with combinations of growth factors; and more specifically the promising area of heparan sulphate polysaccaride immobilization within the bone tissue engineering arena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration
Tang, D., Tare, R. S., Yang, L.-Y., Williams, D. F., Ou, K.-L., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 · Cited by 613
Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 · Cited by 561
Ekaputra, A. K., Prestwich, G. D., Cool, S. M., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2008) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm800565u · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutmacher, D. W., & Cool, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 654-669
- ISSN
- 1582-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1582-4934
- OpenAlex
- W2078126231
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concepts of scaffold‐based tissue engineering—the rationale to use solid free‐form fabrication techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00078.x
- The paper
- Hutmacher, D. W., & Cool, S. (2007). Concepts of scaffold‐based tissue engineering—the rationale to use solid free‐form fabrication techniques. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00078.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.