Cited by 710Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease

Braak, H., Braak, E.·1996·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Our knowledge of the etiology and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is limited. The most conspicuous changes seen in the brain are deposits of insoluble proteins in both extracellular and intraneuronal locations. The extracellular deposits consist primarily of a specific A4 amyloid protein. The significance of these deposits remains to be determined, as they are often found in the cerebral cortex of non-demented elderly persons. More telling is the gradual accumulation of insoluble fibrous material within some neurons that consists mainly of abnormally phosphorylated tau protein. Six stages of increasingly severe cortical destruction can be distinguished. Stages I and II are characterized by neurofibrillary changes that are largely confined to the transentorhinal region, whereas stages III and IV are marked by severe involvement of both the entorhinal and transentorhinal regions. Isocortical destruction occurs during stages V and VI. This progression in cortical pathology correlates with the gradual worsening of clinical symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb05866.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kemper, 1978, Senile dementia: a biomedical approach, 105
  2. Braak, 1993, Alzheimer's disease: advances in clinical and basic research. Third International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, 131

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 710

Metadata

Authors
Braak, H., & Braak, E.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Braak, H.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-04
Volume
94
Issue
S165
Pages
3-12
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971744915
Cited by
710
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 36
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neuropathology, amyloid plaques, tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, entorhinal cortex, cortical atrophy, disease stage, etiopathogenesis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Hippocampus, Humans, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Entorhinal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review