Cited by 121Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Psychiatrists religious attitudes in relation to their clinical-practice - a survey of 231 psychiatrists

Neeleman, J., King, M.B.·1993·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

A total of 231 psychiatrists working in several London teaching hospitals were surveyed about their private religious attitudes and how these affected their reported clinical practice. Although only 27% reported a religious affiliation and 23% a belief in God, 92% felt that psychiatrists should concern themselves with the religious concerns of their patients. Although the psychiatrists who were religious were more likely to make referrals to religious leaders or to disclose their own beliefs to patients, contrary to reports from the United States there was no evidence that psychiatrists' private religious beliefs had an important influence on their clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03484.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neeleman, J., & King, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Maudsley Hospital (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Neeleman, J.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
420-424
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2044983145
Cited by
121
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religious affiliation, clinical practice, teaching hospitals
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Clergy, Communication, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, London, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional Practice, Psychiatry, Referral and Consultation, Religion, Self Disclosure, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review