The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of dopamine in reward and pleasure behaviour – review of data from preclinical research
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this article is to review some of the basic aspects of the dopaminergic system and its role in reward and pleasure behaviour. We also discuss the association between dopamine and unpleasant symptoms that are commonly found in neuropsychiatric disorders and may also be side‐effects of neuroleptic drugs. Method: A computer‐based search of the literature, augmented by extensive bibliography‐guided article reviews, were used to find basic information on the dopamine and the reward systems, and symptoms such as dysphoria, anhedonia and depression. Results: Central dopaminergic neurotransmission is complex, having multiple actions at each level of the mesocorticolimbic reward pathway. The role of dopamine in the reward process was classically associated with the ability to experience pleasure; recent data suggest a more motivational role. Dysfunction of the dopamine transmission in the reward circuit is associated with symptoms such as anhedonia, apathy and dysphoria found in several neuropsychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease, depression, drug addiction, and neuroleptic‐induced dysphoria. Conclusion: Viewing the dysfunctions of the reward pathways within a broader spectrum and exploring its complex relations with the dopaminergic transmission may help understand the pathophysiology of these neuropsychiatric disorders and lead to a rational development of novel treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Di Chiara, G., & Imperato, A. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274 · Cited by 4,733
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Dopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058775 · Cited by 3,176
Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Di Chiara, G. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00286-3 · Cited by 996
Cited by
Sleep disturbance as transdiagnostic: Consideration of neurobiological mechanisms
Harvey, A. G., Murray, G., Chandler, R. A., & Soehner, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.003 · Cited by 609
Reward Processing in Depression: A Conceptual and Meta-Analytic Review Across fMRI and EEG Studies
Keren, H., O’Callaghan, G., Vidal-Ribas, P., Buzzell, G. A., Brotman, M. A., Leibenluft, E., Pan, P. M., Meffert, L., Kaiser, A., Wolke, S., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101124 · Cited by 521
Dopamine dysregulation syndrome: implications for a dopamine hypothesis of bipolar disorder
Berk, M., Dodd, S., Kauer‐Sant’Anna, M., Malhi, G. S., Bourin, M., Kapczinski, F., & Norman, T. (2007) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01058.x · Cited by 396
Nature's clocks and human mood: the circadian system modulates reward motivation
Murray, G., Nicholas, C. L., Kleiman, J., Dwyer, R., Carrington, M. J., Allen, N. B., & Trinder, J. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0017080 · Cited by 185
Richardson, M., McEwan, K., Maratos, F., & Sheffield, D. (2016) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-016-0065-5 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Bressan, R. A., & Crippa, J. A.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-05
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- s427
- Pages
- 14-21
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2073571522
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.