Cited by 73Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatment

Internet forums: a self‐help approach for individuals with schizophrenia?

Haker, H., Lauber, C., Rössler, W.·2005·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: To study if and how online self‐help forums for individuals with schizophrenia are used. Method: We analysed 1200 postings of 576 users in 12 international schizophrenia forums regarding communicative skills [fields of interest and self‐help mechanisms (SHM)]. Results: The forums were predominantly used by affected individuals, few relatives or friends. The fields of interest of the users concern daily problems of the illness like symptoms and emotional involvement with the illness. Self‐help mechanisms mostly used are disclosure and providing information. Emotional interaction e.g. empathy or gratitude were comparatively rare. Conclusion: Individuals suffering from schizophrenia participate in online self‐help forums using the same SHM, discussing similar topics as do individuals with other psychiatric disorders as well as not affected relatives and caregivers. Therefore, this tool seems to be a useful approach to cope with alienation and isolation, albeit only a small number of schizophrenia forums are found in the Internet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00662.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with schizophrenia appeared to use online self-help forums for self-disclosure, sharing personal experiences, providing or requesting information, describing symptoms, or discussing medication.

    “Initial studies exploring use of online self-help forums among individuals with serious mental illnesses have found that individuals with schizophrenia appeared to use these forums for self-disclosure, and sharing personal experiences, in addition to providing or requesting information, describing symptoms, or discussing medication (Haker, Lauber, & Rössler, 2005)”

    From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Haker, Lauber, & Rössler, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haker, H., Lauber, C., & Rössler, W.
Affiliations
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
Corresponding author
Haker, H.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-21
Volume
112
Issue
6
Pages
474-477
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2022341386
Cited by
73
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, online forums, online communication, disclosure, emotional interaction, social isolation, alienation
MeSH terms
Communication, Emotions, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self-Help Groups, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review