Internet forums: a self‐help approach for individuals with schizophrenia?
Abstract
Objective: To study if and how online self‐help forums for individuals with schizophrenia are used. Method: We analysed 1200 postings of 576 users in 12 international schizophrenia forums regarding communicative skills [fields of interest and self‐help mechanisms (SHM)]. Results: The forums were predominantly used by affected individuals, few relatives or friends. The fields of interest of the users concern daily problems of the illness like symptoms and emotional involvement with the illness. Self‐help mechanisms mostly used are disclosure and providing information. Emotional interaction e.g. empathy or gratitude were comparatively rare. Conclusion: Individuals suffering from schizophrenia participate in online self‐help forums using the same SHM, discussing similar topics as do individuals with other psychiatric disorders as well as not affected relatives and caregivers. Therefore, this tool seems to be a useful approach to cope with alienation and isolation, albeit only a small number of schizophrenia forums are found in the Internet.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with schizophrenia appeared to use online self-help forums for self-disclosure, sharing personal experiences, providing or requesting information, describing symptoms, or discussing medication.
“Initial studies exploring use of online self-help forums among individuals with serious mental illnesses have found that individuals with schizophrenia appeared to use these forums for self-disclosure, and sharing personal experiences, in addition to providing or requesting information, describing symptoms, or discussing medication (Haker, Lauber, & Rössler, 2005)”
From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Haker, Lauber, & Rössler, 2005
Cites
Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non‐psychotic relatives
Janssen, I., Krabbendam, L., Jolles, J., & Van Os, J. (2003) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00092.x · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Social support in a wired world: Use of online mental health forums in Norway
Kummervold, P. E., Gammon, D., Bergvik, S., Johnsen, J.-A. K., Hasvold, T., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2002) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039480252803945 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796015001067 · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice
Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Alcazar-Corcoles, M. A., González-Blanch, C., Bendall, S., McGorry, P. D., & Gleeson, J. F. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.021 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Biagianti, B., Quraishi, S. H., & Schlosser, D. A. (2018) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700283 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“Online support groups, forums, and chat rooms help individuals establish new relationships, maintain relationships, and reconnect with people (26) and are important venues for disclosing personal experiences or seeking and sharing information related to symptoms and medications (27).”
BackgroundBroyd, J., Boniface, L., Parsons, D., Murphy, D., & Hafferty, J. D. (2023) · BJPsych Advances · doi:10.1192/bja.2022.15 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Rus-Calafell, M., & Schneider, S. (2020) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2019.09.14 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking
Saalfeld, V., Ramadan, Z., Bell, V., & Raihani, N. J. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.180569 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Internet Forums for Suicide Bereavement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Users
Bailey, E., Krysinska, K., O'Dea, B., & Robinson, J. (2017) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000471 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haker, H., Lauber, C., & Rössler, W.
- Affiliations
- Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Haker, H.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-21
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 474-477
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2022341386
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, online forums, online communication, disclosure, emotional interaction, social isolation, alienation
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Emotions, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self-Help Groups, Treatment Outcome, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review