Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphogenesis of the peri‐implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs

Berglundh, Tord, Abrahamsson, Ingemar, Welander, Maria, Lang, Niklaus P., Lindhe, Jan·2007·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the present experiment was to study the morphogenesis of the mucosal attachment to implants made of c.p. titanium. Material and methods: All mandibular premolars were extracted in 20 Labrador dogs. After a healing period of 3 months, four implants (ITI® Dental Implant System) were placed in the right and left sides of the mandible. A non‐submerged implant installation technique was used and the mucosal tissues were secured to the conical marginal portion of the implants with interrupted sutures. The sutures were removed after 2 weeks and a plaque control program including daily cleaning of the remaining teeth and the implants was initiated. The animals were sacrificed and biopsies were obtained at various intervals to provide healing periods extending from Day 0 (2 h) to 12 weeks. The mandibles were removed and placed in the fixative. The implant sites were dissected using a diamond saw and processed for histological analysis. Results: Large numbers of neutrophils infiltrated and degraded the coagulum that occupied the compartment between the mucosa and the implant during the initial phase of healing. At 2 weeks after surgery, fibroblasts were the dominating cell population in the connective tissue interface but at 4 weeks the density of fibroblasts had decreased. Furthermore, the first signs of epithelial proliferation were observed in specimens representing 1–2 weeks of healing and a mature barrier epithelium occurred after 6–8 weeks of healing. The collagen fibers of the mucosa were organized after 4–6 weeks of healing. Conclusion: It is suggested that the soft‐tissue attachment to implants placed using a non‐submerged installation procedure is properly established after several weeks following surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01380.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Berglundh, T., Abrahamsson, I., Welander, M., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-12
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W2037401310
Cited by
302
References
15
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphogenesis of the peri‐implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01380.x
The paper
Berglundh, T., Abrahamsson, I., Welander, M., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J. (2007). Morphogenesis of the peri‐implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01380.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.