Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study: Cross-sectional study on the prevalence of periimplant disease

Rinke, Sven, Ohl, Susanne, Ziebolz, Dirk, Lange, Katharina, Eickholz, Peter·2011·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the prevalence rates of periimplant mucositis and periimplantitis in partially edentulous patients in a private dental practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 89 patients were collected (52 female, 37 male, age at time of implant placement: 51.8 ± 10.3 years). All patients had been treated with dental implants of the same type and fixed superstructures between January 1999 and June 2006 (observational period: 68.2 ± 24.8 months). RESULTS: The patient-related prevalence rate of periimplant mucositis (probing depth ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing [BOP]) was over all 44.9%. The respective rates in non-smokers without periodontal history were 30.4% and in smokers with periodontal history 80%. The multiple logistic regression analysis identified a significant association of mucositis with the independent variable "smoker" (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; P = 0.023). The patient-related prevalence rate of periimplantitis (probing depth ≥ 5 mm, BOP/pus, radiographic bone loss) was 11.2% (smokers with periodontal history: 53.3%, non-smokers: 2.8%). No periimplant disease was diagnosed in non-smoking patients without periodontal history and with a good compliance after treatment. Statistical analysis identified a significant association of periimplantitis with "smoker" (OR: 31.58; P<0.001) and "compliance" (OR: 0.09; P = 0.011). Periodontal history in general showed no significant association with periimplantitis. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and compliance are important risk factors for periimplant inflammations in partially edentulous patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Rinke, S., Ohl, S., Ziebolz, D., Lange, K., & Eickholz, P.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-28
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
826-833
ISSN
0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1903403098
Cited by
291
References
23
FWCI
20.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study: Cross-sectional study on the prevalence of periimplant disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x
The paper
Rinke, S., Ohl, S., Ziebolz, D., Lange, K., & Eickholz, P. (2011). Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study: Cross-sectional study on the prevalence of periimplant disease. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.