The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to verify the prevalence of peri‐implant disease and analyse possible risk variables associated with peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis. The study group consisted of 212 partially edentulous subjects rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants. Material and Methods: The implants placed were examined clinically and radiographically to assess the peri‐implant status. The degree of association between peri‐implant disease and various independent variables was investigated using a multinomial regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis were 64.6% and 8.9%, respectively. In univariate modelling, healthy peri‐implant subjects presented lower plaque scores, less periodontal bleeding on probing, and less time elapsed since placement of supra‐structures. In multivariate analyses, the risk variables associated with increased odds for having peri‐implant disease included: gender, plaque scores, and periodontal bleeding on probing. Presence of periodontitis and diabetes were statistically associated with increased risk of peri‐implantitis. The only two factors, which did not contribute to the presence of the disease, were the time elapsed since placement of supra‐structures and the frequency of visits for maintenance care. Conclusion: Our data suggest that subjects with periodontitis, diabetes, and poor oral hygiene were more prone to develop peri‐implantitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5 · Cited by 2,689
Cited by
Peri‐implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology
Derks, J., & Tomasi, C. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12334 · Cited by 1,302
Definition and prevalence of peri‐implant diseases
Zitzmann, N. U., & Berglundh, T. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01274.x · Cited by 1,112
Current Concepts in the Management of Periodontitis
Kwon, T., Lamster, I. B., & Levin, L. (2021) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/idj.12630 · Cited by 1,116
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12954 · Cited by 1,066
Peri‐implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators
Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01275.x · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira, S. D., Silva, G. L. M., Cortelli, J. R., Costa, J. E., & Costa, F. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 929-935
- ISSN
- 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-051X
- OpenAlex
- W1985356521
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.01001.x
- The paper
- Ferreira, S. D., Silva, G. L. M., Cortelli, J. R., Costa, J. E., & Costa, F. O. (2006). Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.01001.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.