Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection: An experimental study in dogs

Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Lindhe, J.·1997·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract In the present experiment, the effect on the marginal peri‐implant tissues following repeated abutment removal and subsequent reconnection was studied. 5 beagle dogs were used. The mandibular premolars were extracted and 2 fixtures of the Branemark System® were installed. 1 in each mandibular quadrant. 3 months later, abutment connection was performed. A 6‐month period of plaque control was initiated. Once a month during the plaque control period, the abutment of the right side (test) in each dog was disconnected, cleaned and reconnected to the fixture. Thus, each test abutment was removed and reconnected altogether 5X during this period. The contralateral abutment remained undisturbed for 6 months and served as control. 1 month after the last reconnection, the animals were sacrificed and tissue samples, comprising the implant and the surrounding soft and hard periimplant tissues, were obtained, decalcified, embedded in Epon and sectioned. The following landmarks were identified and used for linear measurements: PM (the marginal portion of the periimplant mucosa). aJE (the level of the apical termination of the junctional epithelium). B (the marginal level of bone to implant contact), A/F (the abutment/fixture border). The findings indicate that the dis‐ and subsequent reconnections of the abutment component of the implant compromised the mucosal barrier and resulted in a more “apically” positioned zone of connective tissue. The additional marginal bone resorption observed at the test sites following abutment manipulation may be the result of tissue reactions initiated to establish a proper “biological width” of the mucosal‐implant barrier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00230.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., & Lindhe, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
568-572
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2149544237
Cited by
422
References
7
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection: An experimental study in dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00230.x
The paper
Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., & Lindhe, J. (1997). The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection: An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00230.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.