Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subgingival microbiota in healthy, well‐maintained elder and periodontitis subjects

Haffajee, A. D., Cugini, M.A., Tanner, A., Pollack, R. P., Smith, C., Kent, R. L., Socransky, S. S.·1998·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract. This investigation compared the site prevalence of 40 subgingival species in 30 periodontally healthy (mean age 36±9 years). 35 elders with a well‐maintained periodontium (mean age 77±5) and 138 adult periodontitis subjects (mean age 46± 11). Subgingival plaque samples were taken from the mesial aspect of each tooth (up to 28 samples) in the 203 subjects at baseline. The presence and levels of 40 subgingival taxa were determined in 5003 plaque samples using whole genomic DNA probes and checkerboard DNA‐DNA hybridization. Clinical assessments including dichotomous measures of gingival redness, bleeding on probing, plaque accumulation and suppuration, as well as duplicate measures of pocket depth and attachment level, were made at 6 sites per tooth. The % of sites colonized by each species (prevalence) was computed for each subject. Differences in prevalence and levels among groups were sought using the Kruskal‐Wallis test. Commonly detected species, such as Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 2, Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus oralis did not differ significantly among subject groups. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, 4 species were significantly elevated and at greater prevalence in the periodontitis group. Mean % of sites (±SEM) colonized by Bacteroides forsythus was 10±3, 12±2 and 40±2 (p<0.001) for healthy, elder and periodontitis groups respectively. The odds ratio was 14.4:1 that a subject had periodontitis when B. forsythus was detected at ≥5% of sampled sites. Mean prevalence for Porphyromonas gingivalis in healthy, elder and periodontitis subjects was 4±2, 5±2 and 23±2 respectively (p<0.001); for Treponema denticola 12±4, 10±3 and 30±2 (p<0.001) and for Selenomonas noxia 6±2, 7±2 and 19±2 (p<0.01). Similar differences among subject groups were observed when only sites with PD 0‐4 mm were analyzed. The data suggest an etiologic role for B. forsythus, P. gingivalis, T. denticola and S. noxia in adult periodontitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02454.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Haffajee, A. D., Cugini, M. A., Tanner, A., Pollack, R. P., Smith, C., Kent, R. L., & Socransky, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
346-353
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W1970283377
Cited by
340
References
28
FWCI
19.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subgingival microbiota in healthy, well‐maintained elder and periodontitis subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02454.x
The paper
Haffajee, A. D., Cugini, M. A., Tanner, A., Pollack, R. P., Smith, C., Kent, R. L., & Socransky, S. S. (1998). Subgingival microbiota in healthy, well‐maintained elder and periodontitis subjects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02454.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.