The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Baseline Donor‐Specific Antibody Levels and Outcomes in Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
Renal transplant candidates with donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) have increased risk of antibody-mediated allograft injury. The goal of this study was to correlate the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), transplant glomerulopathy (TG) and graft survival with the baseline DSA level (prior to initiation of pretransplant conditioning). These analyses include 119 positive crossmatch (+XM) compared to 70 negative crossmatch (-XM) transplants performed between April 2000 and July 2007. Using a combination of cell-based crossmatch tests, DSA level was stratified into very high +XM, high +XM, low +XM and -XM groups. In +XM transplants, increasing DSA level was associated with increased risk for AMR (HR = 1.76 [1.51, 2.07], p = 0.0001) but not TG (p = 0.18). We found an increased risk for both early and late allograft loss associated with very high DSA (HR = 7.71 [2.95, 20.1], p = 0.0001). Although lower DSA recipients commonly developed AMR and TG, allograft survival was similar to that of -XM patients (p = 0.31). We conclude that the baseline DSA level correlates with risk of early and late alloantibody-mediated allograft injury. With current protocols, very high baseline DSA patients have high rates of AMR and poor long-term allograft survival highlighting the need for improved therapy for these candidates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tait, B. D., Süsal, C., Gebel, H. M., Nickerson, P. W., Zachary, A. A., Claas, F. H. J., Reed, E. F., Bray, R. A., Campbell, P., Chapman, J. R., et al. (2013) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e31827a19cc · Cited by 787
Desensitization in HLA-Incompatible Kidney Recipients and Survival
Montgomery, R. A., Lonze, B. E., King, K. E., Kraus, E. S., Kucirka, L. M., Locke, J. E., Warren, D. S., Simpkins, C. E., Dagher, N. N., Singer, A. L., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1012376 · Cited by 687
Stegall, M. D., Diwan, T., Raghavaiah, S., Cornell, L. D., Burns, J., Dean, P. G., Cosio, F. G., Gandhi, M. J., Kremers, W., & Gloor, J. M. (2011) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03757.x · Cited by 577
Self-citationAntibody-Mediated Rejection of Solid-Organ Allografts
Loupy, A., & Lefaucheur, C. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1802677 · Cited by 549
Kaneku, H., O’Leary, J. G., Banuelos, N., Jennings, L. W., Susskind, B. M., Klintmalm, G. B., & Terasaki, P. I. (2013) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12212 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Gloor, J. M., Winters, J. L., Cornell, L. D., Fix, L. A., DeGoey, S. R., Knauer, R. M., Cosio, F. G., Gandhi, M. J., Kremers, W., & Stegall, M. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 582-589
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030088102
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Baseline Donor‐Specific Antibody Levels and Outcomes in Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02985.x
- The paper
- Gloor, J. M., Winters, J. L., Cornell, L. D., Fix, L. A., DeGoey, S. R., Knauer, R. M., Cosio, F. G., Gandhi, M. J., Kremers, W., & Stegall, M. D. (2010). Baseline Donor‐Specific Antibody Levels and Outcomes in Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02985.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.