The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Banff ’09 Meeting Report: Antibody Mediated Graft Deterioration and Implementation of Banff Working Groups
Open accessAbstract
The 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Canada from August 9 to 14, 2009. A total of 263 transplant clinicians, pathologists, surgeons, immunologists and researchers discussed several aspects of solid organ transplants with a special focus on antibody mediated graft injury. The willingness of the Banff process to adapt continuously in response to new research and improve potential weaknesses, led to the implementation of six working groups on the following areas: isolated v-lesion, fibrosis scoring, glomerular lesions, molecular pathology, polyomavirus nephropathy and quality assurance. Banff working groups will conduct multicenter trials to evaluate the clinical relevance, practical feasibility and reproducibility of potential changes to the Banff classification. There were also sessions on quality improvement in biopsy reading and utilization of virtual microscopy for maintaining competence in transplant biopsy interpretation. In addition, compelling molecular research data led to the discussion of incorporation of omics-technologies and discovery of new tissue markers with the goal of combining histopathology and molecular parameters within the Banff working classification in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sellarés, J., de Freitas, D. G., Mengel, M., Reeve, J., Einecke, G., Sis, B., Hidalgo, L. G., Famulski, K., Matas, A., & Halloran, P. F. (2012) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x · Cited by 1,590
Self-citationRejection of the Kidney Allograft
Nankivell, B. J., & Alexander, S. I. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0902927 · Cited by 605
Self-citationYamanaka, T., Matsumoto, S., Teramukai, S., Ishiwata, R., Nagai, Y., & Fukushima, M. (2007) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000127412 · Cited by 454
Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss
Nankivell, B. J., & Kuypers, D. R. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60699-5 · Cited by 324
Self-citationRenal interstitial fibrosis: mechanisms and evaluation
Farris, A. B., & Colvin, R. B. (2012) · Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension · doi:10.1097/mnh.0b013e3283521cfa · Cited by 298
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sis, B., Mengel, M., Haas, M., Colvin, R. B., Halloran, P. F., Racusen, L. C., Solez, K., Baldwin, W. M., Bracamonte, E. R., Broecker, V., Cosio, F., Demetris, A. J., Drachenberg, C., Einecke, G., Gloor, J., Glotz, D., Kraus, E., Legendre, C., Liapis, H., Mannon, R. B., Nankivell, B. J., Nickeleit, V., Papadimitriou, J. C., Randhawa, P., Regele, H., Renaudin, K., Rodriguez, E. R., Seron, D., Seshan, S., Suthanthiran, M., Wasowska, B. A., Zachary, A., & Zeevi, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 464-471
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148223163
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Banff ’09 Meeting Report: Antibody Mediated Graft Deterioration and Implementation of Banff Working Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02987.x
- The paper
- Sis, B., Mengel, M., Haas, M., Colvin, R. B., Halloran, P. F., Racusen, L. C., Solez, K., Baldwin, W. M., Bracamonte, E. R., Broecker, V., Cosio, F., Demetris, A. J., Drachenberg, C., Einecke, G., Gloor, J., Glotz, D., Kraus, E., Legendre, C., Liapis, H., . . . Zeevi, A. (2010). Banff ’09 Meeting Report: Antibody Mediated Graft Deterioration and Implementation of Banff Working Groups. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02987.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
