The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice
Open accessAbstract
Based on the procedure of Prusky et al. (2000, Vision Research, 40, 2201–2209), we used a computer‐based, two‐alternative swim task to evaluate visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice from priority groups A and B of the JAX phenome project (129S1/SvImJ, A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cByJ, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, CAST/Ei, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, MOLF/Ei, SJL/J, SM/J and SPRET/Ei). Each mouse was tested for eight trials/day for 8 days on each of the three tests. There was a significant strain difference in visual ability in all three tests. Mice with reported normal vision (129S1/SvImJ, C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) and one albino strain (AKR/J) performed very well in these tasks. The other albino strains (A/J, BALB/cByJ and BALB/cJ) took longer to learn the tasks than mice with normal vision and did not reach the criterion of 70% correct. Mice with retinal degeneration (C3H/HeJ, FVB/NJ, MOLF/Ei and SJL/J) performed only at chance levels as did the three strains with unknown visual abilities (CAST/Ei, SM/J and SPRET/Ei). Because many behavioral tasks for rodents rely on visual cues, we suggest that the visual abilities of mice should be evaluated before they are tested in commonly used visuo‐spatial learning and memory tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies
Ambati, J., Ambati, B. K., Yoo, S. H., Ianchulev, S., & Adamis, A. P. (2003) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(03)00030-4 · Cited by 959
Cited by
Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation
Harvey, C. D., Collman, F., Dombeck, D. A., & Tank, D. W. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08499 · Cited by 873
Bilousova, T. V., Dansie, L., Ngo, M., Aye, J., Charles, J. R., Ethell, D. W., & Ethell, I. M. (2009) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.061796 · Cited by 465
Restoration of visual function in retinal degeneration mice by ectopic expression of melanopsin
Lin, B., Koizumi, A., Tanaka, N., Panda, S., & Masland, R. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806114105 · Cited by 302
The touchscreen operant platform for testing working memory and pattern separation in rats and mice.
Oomen, C. A., Hvoslef-Eide, M., Heath, C. J., Mar, A. C., Horner, A. E., Bussey, T. J., & Saksida, L. M. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.124 · Cited by 193
Pickett, E. K., Herrmann, A. G., McQueen, J., Abt, K., Dando, O., Tulloch, J., Jain, P., Dunnett, S., Sohrabi, S., Fjeldstad, M. P., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.044 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, A. A., & Brown, R. E.
- Venue
- Genes, Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 389-403
- ISSN
- 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1601-1848
- OpenAlex
- W2080292373
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00173.x
- The paper
- Wong, A. A., & Brown, R. E. (2006). Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00173.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.