The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory
Abstract
Preference theory is a new approach to explaining current and future patterns of employment and fertility among women in modern societies. Although economists usually claim that preferences cannot be measured, methods for identifying women's and men's lifestyle preferences were developed and applied in British (and Spanish) national surveys, confirming the results of previous British and American studies showing three distinct lifestyle preference groups. The results confirm the heterogeneity of women's preferences and suggest that preferences are the primary determinant of fertility and employment decisions. The implications for policies to raise fertility are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s
Kohler, H., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x · Cited by 1,451
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229030 · Cited by 1,353
Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition
McDonald, P. (2000) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x · Cited by 1,154
Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory
Hakim, C. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199242092.001.0001 · Cited by 968
Self-citationThe Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995) · Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198289708.003.0002 · Cited by 962
Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory
Rogers, J. K., & Hakim, C. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089487 · Cited by 934
Self-citationFertility and Women's Employment in Industrialized Nations
Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271 · Cited by 902
Women's Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137521 · Cited by 769
Women's Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.431 · Cited by 766
Cited by
Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y · Cited by 623
Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature
Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12431 · Cited by 259
Childless or Childfree? Paths to Voluntary Childlessness in Italy
Tanturri, M. L., & Mencarini, L. (2008) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00205.x · Cited by 198
Wood, J., Neels, K., & Kil, T. (2014) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2014.31.46 · Cited by 139
Europe the continent with the lowest fertility
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq023 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakim, C.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-374
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W2048707763
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 28.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00349.x
- The paper
- Hakim, C. (2003). A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00349.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.