CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and Contraception

How far has fertility in China really declined?

Retherford, Robert D., Choe, Minja Kim, Chen, Jiajian, Xiru, Li, Hongyan, Cui·2005·Population and Development Review
DOI 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00052.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

According to births in the last year as reported in China's 2000 census, the total fertility rate (TFR) in the year 2000 in China was 1.22 children per woman. This estimate is widely considered to be too low, primarily because some women who had out-of-quota births according to China's one-child family policy did not report those births to the census enumerator. Analysis of fertility trends derived by applying the own-children method of fertility estimation to China's 1990 and 2000 censuses indicates that the true level of the TFR in 2000 was probably between 1.5 and 1.6 children per woman. A decomposition analysis of change in the TFR between 1990 and 2000, based on our best estimate of 1.59 for the TFR in 2000, indicates that about two-fifths of the decline in the conventional TFR between 1990 and 2000 is accounted for by later marriage and less marriage, and three-fifths by declining fertility within marriage. The analysis also applies the birth history reconstruction method of fertility estimation to the two censuses, yielding an alternative set of fertility estimates that are compared with the set derived by the own-children method. The analysis also includes estimates of trends in fertility by urban/rural residence, education, ethnicity, and migration status. Over time, fertility has declined sharply within all categories of these characteristics, indicating that the one-child policy has had large across-the-board effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00052.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Almost every couple will be able to have the number of children they desire under the new policy.

    “The new policy will allow almost all couples to meet their reproductive preference.59,60”

    From The effects of China’s universal two-child policy (2016) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Retherford, R. D., Choe, M. K., Chen, J., Xiru, L., & Hongyan, C.
Affiliations
  • East–West Center (US)
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (CN)
ORCID
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
57-84
ISSN
  • 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1728-4457
DOI
10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00052.x
OpenAlex
W1979410892
Cited by
116
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3836 d)
Locations
Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
fertility decline, total fertility rate, one-child policy, own-children method, fertility decomposition, marriage timing, urban-rural fertility differences, ethnic differences in fertility, migrant fertility, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review