Reexamining China's Fertility Puzzle: Data Collection and Quality over the Last Two Decades
Abstract
China's fertility level has become a matter of considerable debate since the early 1990s. Despite the widespread concern over data quality, a review of the literature reveals little systematic examination of how fertility data are collected, what specific problems they pose, and how they have been used in demographic research. This article examines five major fertility data sources and identifies problems in producing and using fertility data and discusses their implications. Issues relating to China's controversial 2000 census results and the reported low fertility are examined. The analysis concludes that the prevalent uncertainty about fertility levels may not only be related to the problem of data quality, but could also arise from misinterpreting fertility data and exaggerating the problem of undercounting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
They did so against the overwhelming empirical evidence from numerous surveys and censuses, and a body of rigorous research.
“They did so against the overwhelming empirical evidence from numerous surveys and censuses, and a body of rigorous research (Feeney & Yuan 1994, Zhang & Zhao 2006, Wang 2015, Guo et al. 2017).”
From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Zhang & Zhao 2006
Cites
Merli, M. G., & Raftery, A. E. (2000) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2648100 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effects of China’s universal two-child policy
Zeng, Y., & Hesketh, T. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31405-2 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
The End of “Lowest‐Low” Fertility?
Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00304.x · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Probabilistic projections of the total fertility rate for all countries
Alkema, L., Raftery, A. E., Gerland, P., Clark, S. J., Pelletier, F., Buettner, T., & Heilig, G. K. (2011) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0040-5 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Feng, W. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00383.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
A policy analysis on challenges and opportunities of population/household aging in China
Zeng, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Population Ageing · doi:10.1007/s12062-014-9102-y · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Estimates of pandemic excess mortality in India based on civil registration data
Banaji, M., & Gupta, A. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000803 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-321
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W1978281406
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 32
- FWCI
- 17.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- fertility data, data quality, fertility measurement, China, 2000 census, undercounting, fertility decline, demographic data sources, data collection problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review