Cited by 59Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Fermentation characteristics and microorganism composition of total mixed ration silage with local food by‐products in different seasons

CAO, Yang, CAI, Yimin, HIRAKUBO, Tomomi, FUKUI, Hiroyuki, MATSUYAMA, Hiroki·2011·Animal Science Journal

Abstract

Total mixed ration (TMR) silage in different seasons was prepared with apple refuse, orchardgrass hay, orchardgrass silage, corn silage and a commercial compound feed in Tohoku, Japan, and with tofu cake, brewers' grains, tall fescue hay, Sudangrass hay, timothy hay, alfalfa hay and a commercial compound feed in Shikoku, Japan, respectively, and their fermentation quality and microorganism composition were evaluated. In Tohoku, the TMR silage in spring, autumn and winter displayed poor quality, with pH value above 4.7, and the harmful microorganisms such as escherichia, yeasts and molds were detected even after 60 days of ensiling; but the TMR silage in summer was well preserved and the escherichia were too few to count after 7 days of ensiling. In Shikoku, the TMR silage in all seasons was well preserved, with low pH, high lactic acid contents, and escherichia, yeasts and molds were consistently at or below the detectable numbers after 7 days of ensiling. The results showed that the TMR silage could not produce sufficient lactic acid to improve silage quality under low-temperature conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to develop preparation techniques of promoting the lactic acid fermentation for TMR silage in cold seasons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00840.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CAO, Y., CAI, Y., HIRAKUBO, T., FUKUI, H., & MATSUYAMA, H.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science (JP)
  • Iwate Prefectural Government (JP)
  • Tokushima Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Technology Support Center (JP)
Corresponding author
CAI, Yimin
Venue
Animal Science Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-02
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
259-266
ISSN
  • 1344-3941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-0929
OpenAlex
W1952346739
Cited by
59
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Science Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
total mixed ration silage, lactic acid fermentation, Escherichia, molds and yeasts, brewer's grains, Dactylis glomerata, tall fescue, alfalfa, corn silage, Tohoku region, Shikoku
MeSH terms
Fermentation, Food, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Seasons, Silage, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review