Cited by 614Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in LawPolicing Practices and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To Predict and Serve?

Open access
Lum, Kristian, Isaac, William·2016·Significance

Abstract

Predictive policing systems are used increasingly by law enforcement to try to prevent crime before it occurs. But what happens when these systems are trained using biased data? Kristian Lum and William Isaac consider the evidence – and the social consequences

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gorner, 2013, Chicago police use “heat list” as strategy to prevent violence
  2. Langan, 1995, The racial disparity in U.S. drug arrests
  3. Mosher, 2010, The Mismeasure of Crime

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–614 of 614

Metadata

Authors
Lum, K., & Isaac, W.
Affiliations
  • Kristian Lum, PhD is Lead statistician at the Human Rights Data Analysis Group
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Significance
Published
2016-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
14-19
ISSN
  • 1740-9705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-9713
OpenAlex
W2529251251
Cited by
611
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 14
FWCI
92.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Significance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
predictive policing, algorithmic bias, biased training data, crime prediction, law enforcement, algorithmic fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review