Cited by 253Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

High‐resolution NMR studies of the zinc‐binding site of the Alzheimer's amyloid β‐peptide

Danielsson, Jens, Pierattelli, Roberta, Banci, Lucia, Gräslund, Astrid·2007·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Metal binding to the amyloid beta-peptide is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. We used high-resolution NMR to study zinc binding to amyloid beta-peptide 1-40 at physiologic pH. Metal binding induces a structural change in the peptide, which is in chemical exchange on an intermediate rate, between the apo-form and the holo-form, with respect to the NMR timescale. This causes loss of NMR signals in the resonances affected by the binding. Heteronuclear correlation experiments, (15)N-relaxation and amide proton exchange experiments on amyloid beta-peptide 1-40 revealed that zinc binding involves the three histidines (residues 6, 13 and 14) and the N-terminus, similar to a previously proposed copper-binding site [Syme CD, Nadal RC, Rigby SE, Viles JH (2004) J Biol Chem 279, 18169-18177]. Fluorescence experiments show that zinc shares a common binding site with copper and that the metals have similar affinities for amyloid beta-peptide. The dissociation constant K(d) of zinc for the fragment amyloid beta-peptide 1-28 was measured by fluorescence, using competitive binding studies, and that for amyloid beta-peptide 1-40 was measured by NMR. Both methods gave K(d) values in the micromolar range at pH 7.2 and 286 K. Zinc also has a second, weaker binding site involving residues between 23 and 28. At high metal ion concentrations, the metal-induced aggregation should mainly have an electrostatic origin from decreased repulsion between peptides. At low…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05563.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danielsson, J., Pierattelli, R., Banci, L., & Gräslund, A.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-20
Volume
274
Issue
1
Pages
46-59
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W2019511555
Cited by
253
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
amyloid-beta, zinc binding, Alzheimer's disease, metal binding sites, histidine residues, copper binding site, peptide aggregation, dissociation constant, 15N relaxation, amide proton exchange, competitive binding
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Binding Sites, Circular Dichroism, Copper, Histidine, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Peptide Fragments, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Zinc, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review