The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Veterinary Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: In the production of food animals, large amounts of antimicrobial agents are used for therapy and prophylaxis of bacterial infections and in feed to promote growth. There are large variations in the amounts of antimicrobial agents used to produce the same amount of meat among the different European countries, which leaves room for considerable reductions in some countries. The emergence of resistant bacteria and resistance genes due to the use of antimicrobial agents are well documented. In Denmark it has been possible to reduce the usage of antimicrobial agents for food animals significantly and in general decreases in resistance have followed. Guidelines for prudent use of antimicrobial agents may help to slow down the selection for resistance and should be based on knowledge regarding the normal susceptibility patterns of the causative agents and take into account the potential problems for human health. Current knowledge regarding the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in food animals, the quantitative impact of the use of different antimicrobial agents on selection of resistance and the most appropriate treatment regimes to limit the development of resistance is incomplete. Programmes monitoring the occurrence and development of resistance and consumption of antimicrobial agents are strongly desirable, as is research into the most appropriate ways to use antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinolone-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni Infections in Minnesota, 1992–1998
Smith, K. E., Besser, J. M., Hedberg, C. W., Leano, F. T., Bender, J. B., Wicklund, J. H., Johnson, B. P., Moore, K. A., & Osterholm, M. T. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199905203402001 · Cited by 666
Eady, E. A., & Cove, J. H. (2003) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/00001432-200304000-00007 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments
Allen, H. K., Donato, J., Wang, H. H., Cloud-Hansen, K. A., Davies, J., & Handelsman, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2312 · Cited by 2,361
Cantas, L., Shah, S. Q. A., Cavaco, L. M., Manaia, C. M., Walsh, F., Popowska, M., Garelick, H., Bürgmann, H., & Sørum, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096 · Cited by 357
Pardon, B., Hostens, M., Duchateau, L., Dewulf, J., De Bleecker, K., & Deprez, P. (2013) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/1746-6148-9-79 · Cited by 138
Schnyder, P., Schönecker, L., Schüpbach-Regula, G., & Meylan, M. (2019) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.007 · Cited by 65
Coetzee, J. F., Magstadt, D. R., Sidhu, P. K., Follett, L., Schuler, A. M., Krull, A. C., Cooper, V. L., Engelken, T. J., Kleinhenz, M. D., & O’Connor, A. M. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219104 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Aarestrup, F. M.
- Venue
- Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 271-281
- ISSN
- 1742-7835 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-7843
- OpenAlex
- W1991197039
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Veterinary Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960401.x
- The paper
- Aarestrup, F. M. (2005). Veterinary Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960401.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.