Cited by 84Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Erectile dysfunction: monitoring response to treatment in clinical practice—Recommendations of an international study panel

Mulhall, John, Althof, Stanley E., Brock, Gerald B., Goldstein, Irwin, Jünemann, Klaus-Peter, Kirby, Michael·2007·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines for management of erectile dysfunction (ED) provide limited direction in defining appropriate treatment goals with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy. AIM: To establish an evidence-based position on treatment goals in ED, including the role of erection hardness, with the potential to improve self-esteem, confidence, and overall sexual and relationship satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The target of ED therapy is optimization of a rigid erectile response, as assessed by the 4-point Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Methods. An international panel of experts in urology, psychology, and primary care convened to evaluate retrospective data from worldwide phase 2, 3, and 4 clinical trials, involving over 10,000 men with ED, as well as data from recent prospective studies, concerning the role of erection hardness in defining the response to treatment with PDE5 therapy. RESULTS: Significant positive correlations were found between EHS and the Quality of Erection Questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function domain score and other IIEF measures. Significant positive correlations were also found between erection hardness and psychosocial measures such as self-esteem, confidence, and relationship satisfaction (assessed by the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire), and satisfaction with medical treatment (assessed by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction). A shift in most frequent erection from EHS 3 (hard enough for penetration but not fully hard) at baseline to EHS 4 (completely hard and fully rigid) at the end of treatment was accompanied by significant improvements in intercourse and relationship satisfaction, psychosocial benefits, and satisfaction with ED treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Support is found for monitoring and treating patients with ED to their full erectile potential. Quantitative assessment of erection hardness in clinical practice will lead to improved outcomes in overall sexual experience and optimal treatment satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00441.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of review papers and clinical guidelines on ED approach assessment and treatment from a purely medical perspective and pay little attention to psychosocial aspects.

    “By now, there are several review papers and clinical guidelines available on ED,9, 10, 11, 12, 13 but the majority of these papers approach the assessment and treatment of ED from a purely medical perspective and pay only little attention to describing the psychosocial aspects of ED.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulhall, J., Althof, S. E., Brock, G. B., Goldstein, I., Jünemann, K.-P., & Kirby, M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Center for Marital and Sexual Health of South Florida , West Palm Beach , USA
  • St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
  • Milton , USA
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Mulhall, John
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
448-464
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2082055010
Cited by
84
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, treatment goals, treatment response monitoring, sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, self-esteem, treatment satisfaction, International Index of Erectile Function
MeSH terms
Vardenafil Dihydrochloride, Adult, Coitus, United Kingdom, Humans, Imidazoles, Erectile Dysfunction, International Cooperation, Male, Penile Erection, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Piperazines, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Sex Education, Sulfones, Triazines, Vasodilator Agents, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review