Cited by 147Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Impact of erectile dysfunction and its subsequent treatment with sildenafil: qualitative study

Open access
Tomlinson, John, Wright, David·2004·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of erectile dysfunction and to explore the impact of treatment with sildenafil (Viagra). DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative study with semistructured interviews. SETTING: Men's health clinic in NHS hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 40 men who had had erectile dysfunction and had attended the clinic during the year before interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of erectile dysfunction on men, their expectations of sildenafil, and impact of treatment on men and their relationships. Issues explored with exploratory qualitative approach. RESULTS: Erectile dysfunction caused serious distress to all those men who experienced it, with marked effects on their self esteem and their relationships. Sildenafil, when it worked, caused a great improvement in wellbeing. The expectations raised by media hyperbole with the launch of sildenafil had an adverse effect on the morale of those who found it did not work. When, according to the patient, treatment did not work, the distress was severe and for many confirmed their lack of self worth. CONCLUSIONS: Further study is needed to explore the feelings of men affected by erectile dysfunction and their perception of treatment. Health professionals should be aware of the extreme distress erectile dysfunction can cause.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38044.662176.ee

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR, Assendelft WJJ. Systematic review of prevalence studies of common sexual problems. J Sex Marital Ther 2002;28:399-4.
  2. [18]18. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. The process of analysis. In: Ethnography: principles in prac- tice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1989:205-38. (Accepted 20 February 2004) doi 10.1136/bmj.38044.662176.EE Men's Health Clinic, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester SO22 5DG John Tomlinson director Macmillan Research Unit, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ David Wright Macmillan research fellow Correspondence to: J Tomlinson john@jptomlinson.comClays Farm, East Worldham, Alton GU34 3AD

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomlinson, J., & Wright, D.
Affiliations
  • Royal Hampshire County Hospital (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Tomlinson, John
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-03-29
Volume
328
Issue
7447
Pages
1037
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2098990235
Cited by
147
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, sildenafil, psychological impact, self-esteem, men's relationships, treatment expectations, media hype, treatment failure, men's health
MeSH terms
Sildenafil Citrate, Adult, Aged, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Piperazines, Purines, Sulfones, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review