The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS
Abstract
The study empirically links conflict management literature with research on efficacy and organizational teams. Sixty‐one self‐managing teams with 489 employees were recruited from the production department of a leading electronic manufacturer. Structural equation analysis supports the model that a cooperative instead of competitive approach to conflict leads to conflict efficacy that in turn results in effective performance as measured by managers. Findings suggest how organizational teams can be prepared to make use of their autonomy to deal with problems and conflicts so that they are productive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071
The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse Groups
Nishii, L. H. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0823 · Cited by 1,354
Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.12.010 · Cited by 298
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Ayoko, O. B., Callan, V. J., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407304921 · Cited by 159
Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments
O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9465-3 · Cited by 54
Siu, H., Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Finegan, J. (2008) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/01.nna.0000312772.04234.1f · Cited by 52
Measuring the effectiveness of an alternative education collaboration: Newark, New Jersey
Genao, S. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-01-2013-0011 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- ALPER, S., TJOSVOLD, D., & LAW, K. S.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 625-642
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2071741983
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 29.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
