The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS
Abstract
We used meta‐analytic procedures to investigate the criterion‐related validity of assessment center dimension ratings. By focusing on dimension‐level information, we were able to assess the extent to which specific constructs account for the criterion‐related validity of assessment centers. From a total of 34 articles that reported dimension‐level validities, we collapsed 168 assessment center dimension labels into an overriding set of 6 dimensions: (a) consideration/awareness of others, (b) communication, (c) drive, (d) influencing others, (e) organizing and planning, and (f) problem solving. Based on this set of 6 dimensions, we extracted 258 independent data points. Results showed a range of estimated true criterion‐related validities from .25 to .39. A regression‐based composite consisting of 4 out of the 6 dimensions accounted for the criterion‐related validity of assessment center ratings and explained more variance in performance (20%) than Gaugler, Rosenthal, Thornton, and Bentson (1987) were able to explain using the overall assessment center rating (14%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,327
Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 · Cited by 2,107
Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.869 · Cited by 1,745
PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW
TETT, R. P., JACKSON, D. N., & ROTHSTEIN, M. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x · Cited by 1,481
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Psychological testing: By Marianne Cederblad and Allis Danielson
(1968) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1968.tb07939.x · Cited by 557
SCHMITT, N., GOODING, R. Z., NOE, R. A., & KIRSCH, M. (1984) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x · Cited by 553
Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.
Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.72.3.493 · Cited by 478
Cited by
Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationBeyond Dichotomies: Competence Viewed as a Continuum
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000194 · Cited by 1,205
Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance
Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2348 · Cited by 991
Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures
(2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2018.195 · Cited by 300
The susceptible circle: a taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership.
Thoroughgood, C. N., Padilla, A., Hunter, S. T., & Tate, B. W. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.007 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- ARTHUR, W., DAY, E. A., MCNELLY, T. L., & EDENS, P. S.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-153
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2104375282
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00146.x
- The paper
- ARTHUR, W., DAY, E. A., MCNELLY, T. L., & EDENS, P. S. (2003). A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00146.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
