The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A CROSS‐NATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORK‐FAMILY STRESSORS, WORKING HOURS, AND WELL‐BEING: CHINA AND LATIN AMERICA VERSUS THE ANGLO WORLD
Abstract
A comparative study of work-family stressors, work hours and well-being was described contrasting 3 culturally distinct regions: Anglo (Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and U.S.), China (Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China, and Taiwan) and Latin America(Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay). Samples of managers were surveyed in each country, and country data were combined for the 3 regions. Support was found for the hypothesis that Anglos would demonstrate a stronger positive relation between work hours and work-family stressors than Chinese and Latins. In all 3 samples, work-family stressors related to increased job satisfaction and reduced well-being. Latins were found to work the most hours, have the most children, and report the highest job satisfaction. China was the only region in which being married and having more children related positively to all measures of well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research.
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278 · Cited by 2,767
Self-citationThe cultural relativity of the quality of life concept
Hofstede, G. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653 · Cited by 1,257
(1997) · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00656.x · Cited by 722
Self-citationA validation study of the OSI on a blue‐collar sample
Cooper, C. L., & Williams, J. (1991) · Stress Medicine · doi:10.1002/smi.2460070210 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Cited by
A resource perspective on the work–home interface: the work–home resources model
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0027974 · Cited by 1,660
Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables
Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428110369842 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citationWork and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations.
Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.57 · Cited by 1,111
Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations
Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307300818 · Cited by 980
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010 · Cited by 965
Metadata
- Authors
- SPECTOR, P. E., COOPER, C. L., POELMANS, S., ALLEN, T. D., O'DRISCOLL, M., SANCHEZ, J. I., SIU, O. L., DEWE, P., HART, P., & LU, L.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-142
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2011415903
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CROSS‐NATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORK‐FAMILY STRESSORS, WORKING HOURS, AND WELL‐BEING: CHINA AND LATIN AMERICA VERSUS THE ANGLO WORLD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02486.x
- The paper
- SPECTOR, P. E., COOPER, C. L., POELMANS, S., ALLEN, T. D., O'DRISCOLL, M., SANCHEZ, J. I., SIU, O. L., DEWE, P., HART, P., & LU, L. (2004). A CROSS‐NATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORK‐FAMILY STRESSORS, WORKING HOURS, AND WELL‐BEING: CHINA AND LATIN AMERICA VERSUS THE ANGLO WORLD. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02486.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
