The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembly bias in the clustering of dark matter haloes
Open accessAbstract
We use a very large simulation of structure growth in a Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) universe — the Millennium Simulation — to study assembly bias, the fact that the large-scale clustering of haloes of given mass varies significantly with their assembly history. We extend earlier work based on the same simulation by superposing results for redshifts from 0 to 3, by defining a less noisy estimator of clustering amplitude, and by considering halo concentration, substructure mass fraction and spin, as well as formation time, as additional parameters. These improvements lead to results with less noise than previous studies and covering a wider range of halo masses and structural properties. We find significant and significantly different assembly bias effects for all the halo properties we consider, although in all cases the dependencies on halo mass and on redshift are adequately described as a dependence on equivalent peak height ν(M, z). The ν-dependencies for different halo properties differ qualitatively and are not related as might naively be expected given the relations between formation time, concentration, substructure fraction and spin found for the halo population as a whole. These results suggest that it will be difficult to build models for the galaxy populations of dark haloes which can robustly relate the amplitude of large-scale galaxy clustering to that for mass clustering at better than the 10 per cent level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Self-citationThe cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars
Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Yoshida, N., Gao, L., Navarro, J., Thacker, R., Croton, D., Helly, J., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03597 · Cited by 5,067
Self-citationThe evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter
Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1985) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/163168 · Cited by 3,391
Self-citationPopulating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at \fontshape{it}{z}=0
Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Tormen, G., & Kauffmann, G. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x · Cited by 2,707
Self-citationMerger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation
Lacey, C., & Cole, S. (1993) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 · Cited by 2,190
A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Seljak, U., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177793 · Cited by 2,019
Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations
Bond, J. R., Cole, S., Efstathiou, G., & Kaiser, N. (1991) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/170520 · Cited by 1,850
An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes
Mo, H. J., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 · Cited by 1,492
Self-citationCluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω
Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/282.1.263 · Cited by 1,137
Cited by
Dark matter and cosmic structure
Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2012) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201200212 · Cited by 409
Self-citationThe Copernicus Complexio: a high-resolution view of the small-scale Universe
Hellwing, W. A., Frenk, C. S., Cautun, M., Bose, S., Helly, J., Jenkins, A., Sawala, T., & Cytowski, M. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw214 · Cited by 107
“This trend in halo-to-halo scatter can be understood in light of halo assembly bias, which was first pointed out by Gao & White (2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, L., & White, S. D. M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L5-L9
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3933
- OpenAlex
- W2103774670
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assembly bias in the clustering of dark matter haloes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00292.x
- The paper
- Gao, L., & White, S. D. M. (2007). Assembly bias in the clustering of dark matter haloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00292.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.