The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The small covering factor of cold accretion streams
Open accessAbstract
Theoretical models of galaxy formation predict that galaxies acquire most of their baryons via cold mode accretion. Observations of high-redshift galaxies, while showing ubiquitous outflows, have so far not revealed convincing traces of the predicted cold streams, which has been interpreted as a challenge for the current models. Using high-resolution, zoom-in smooth particle hydrodynamics simulations of Lyman break galaxy (LBG) haloes combined with ionizing radiative transfer, we quantify the covering factor of the cold streams at z= 2–4. We focus specifically on Lyman limit systems (LLSs) and damped Lyα absorbers (DLAs), which can be probed by absorption spectroscopy using a background galaxy or quasar sightline, and which are closely related to low-ionization metal absorbers. We show that the covering factor of these systems is relatively small and decreases with time. At z= 2, the covering factor of DLAs within the virial radius of the simulated galaxies is ∼3 per cent (∼1 per cent within twice this projected distance), and arises principally from the galaxy itself. The corresponding values for LLSs are ∼10 and 4 per cent. Because of their small covering factor compared to the order unity covering fraction expected for galactic winds, the cold streams are naturally dominated by outflows in stacked spectra. We conclude that the existing observations are consistent with the predictions of cold mode accretion, and outline promising kinematic and chemical diagnostics to separate out the signatures of galactic accretion and feedback.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Cited by
The cosmic baryon cycle and galaxy mass assembly in the FIRE simulations
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Kereš, D., Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1517 · Cited by 422
Self-citationEarly galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
The current status of galaxy formation
Silk, J., & Mamon, G. A. (2012) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/8/004 · Cited by 294
Absorption-line systems in simulated galaxies fed by cold streams: ALSs in simulated galaxies
Fumagalli, M., Prochaska, J. X., Kasen, D., Dekel, A., Ceverino, D., & Primack, J. R. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19599.x · Cited by 298
Bernardini, M., Feldmann, R., Anglés-Alcázar, D., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J., Mayer, L., & Stadel, J. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3088 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., & Kereš, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 412
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L118-L122
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3933
- OpenAlex
- W1932831857
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The small covering factor of cold accretion streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01018.x
- The paper
- Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., & Kereš, D. (2011). The small covering factor of cold accretion streams. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01018.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.