Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AGAINST FOODBORNE PATHOGENS

TAYEL, AHMED A., EL‐TRAS, WAEL F., MOUSSA, SHAABAN, EL‐BAZ, ASHRAF F., MAHROUS, HODA, SALEM, MOHAMMED F., BRIMER, LEON·2011·Journal of Food Safety

Abstract

The current spreading of nanomaterial applications supports the search for further possible functions of theses diminutive particles. The antibacterial potentiality of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs), compared with conventional ZnO powder, against nine bacterial strains, mostly foodborne including pathogens, was evaluated using qualitative and quantitative assays. ZnO NP was more efficient as antibacterial agent than powder. Gram‐positive bacteria were generally more sensitive to ZnO than Gram negatives. The exposure of Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus to their relevant minimal inhibitory concentrations from ZnO NP reduced the cell number to zero within 8 and 4 h, respectively. Scanning electron micrographs of the treated bacteria with NPs exhibited that the disruptive effect of ZnO on S. aureus was vigorous as all treated cells were completely exploded or lysed after only 4 h from exposure. Promising results of ZnO NP antibacterial activity suggest its usage in food systems as preservative agent after further required investigations and risk assessments. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Foodborne pathogen invasion is still a recurrent serious problem facing researchers and food industry overseers. The introduction of novel powerful antimicrobial agents is of great importance for the control of pathogenic bacteria, especially antibiotic‐resistant strains. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticle (NP) could be one of these potential alternatives. This study focused on ZnO NP because of its increasing presence in many marketable products and that supports its application in food industries as a reasonably safe agent. The demonstrated antibacterial activity of ZnO NP recommends its possible application in the food preservation field; otherwise it can be applied as a potent sanitizing agent for disinfecting and sterilizing food industry equipment and containers against the attack and contamination with foodborne pathogenic bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00287.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/nature07971 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1166/jnn.2005.034 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1590/S0036-46651991000600014 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1201/9781439832837.ch11 · doi:10.1201/9781439832837.ch11
  5. BENNET D.J., 2005, Nanobiotechnology: Responsible action on issue in society and ethics, NSTI-Nanotech., 2, 765
  6. BHUNIA A.K., 2008, Foodborne Microbial Pathogens: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis
  7. 10.1021/nl052326h · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1021/j100278a031 · DOI
  9. 10.1055/s-2006-957563 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/jp0502196 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1039/b413175d · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1517/14712598.7.12.1811 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00024-8 · doi:10.1016/s1010-6030(03)00024-8
  15. 10.1080/10934520600966177 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.025 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01013.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/cbic.200400174 · DOI
  19. KUMAR C., 2006, Nanomaterials: Toxicity, Health, and Environmental Issues
  20. 10.1021/es070996e · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04303.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. LYON D.Y., 2007, Environmental Nanotechnology, Applications and Impacts of Nanomaterials, 445
  23. MEYER M., 2002, Nanotechnology: Generalizations in an interdisciplinary field of science and technology, Int. J. Philos. Chem., 10, 153
  24. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76234-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1063/1.2742324 · DOI · Paper page
  26. RICHARDS E., 2006, Antibacterial wallpaper, Chemtech, 2006, 11
  27. RYAN K.J., 2004, Sherris Medical Microbiology
  28. 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00037-X · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.ica.2005.12.057 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1021/la0202374 · DOI · Paper page
  31. SWEETMAN S.C., 2005, Martindale, The Complete Drug Reference, 1163
  32. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.081 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.04.005 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/es060999b · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/jac/49.4.641 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/MTAS.2004.1371632 · doi:10.1109/mtas.2004.1371632
  37. 10.1016/S1466-6049(01)00197-0 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1007/s11051-006-9150-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
TAYEL, A. A., EL‐TRAS, W. F., MOUSSA, S., EL‐BAZ, A. F., MAHROUS, H., SALEM, M. F., & BRIMER, L.
Venue
Journal of Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-18
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
211-218
ISSN
  • 0149-6085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4565
OpenAlex
W1582426659
Cited by
361
References
1
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AGAINST FOODBORNE PATHOGENS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00287.x
The paper
TAYEL, A. A., EL‐TRAS, W. F., MOUSSA, S., EL‐BAZ, A. F., MAHROUS, H., SALEM, M. F., & BRIMER, L. (2011). ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AGAINST FOODBORNE PATHOGENS. Journal of Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00287.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.