A Sensitive and Quick Microplate Method to Determine the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of Plant Extracts for Bacteria
Abstract
Agar diffusion techniques are used widely to assay plant extracts for antimicrobial activity, but there are problems associated with this technique. A micro-dilution technique was developed using 96-well microplates and tetrazolium salts to indicate bacterial growth. p-Iodonitrotetrazolium violet [0.2 mg/ml] gave better results than tetrazolium red or thiazolyl blue. The method is quick, worked well with Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli and with non-aqueous extracts from many different plants. The method gave reproducible results; required only 10-25 microliters of extract to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations, distinguished between microcidal and microstatic effects, and provided a permanent record of the results. Using S. aureus, and a Combretum molle extract, the technique was 32 times more sensitive than agar diffusion techniques and was not sensitive to culture age of the test organism up to 24 hours. The S. aureus culture could be stored up to 10 days in a cold room with little effect on the assay results. This method was useful in screening plants for antimicrobial activity and for the bioassay-guided isolation of antimicrobial compounds from plants. MIC values determined for sulfisoxazole, norfloxacin, gentamicin, and nitrofuratoin were similar to values indicated in the literature but values obtained with trimethroprim and ampicillin were higher with some bacteria.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acetone received the highest overall rating among a variety of extractants examined for ability to solubilize antimicrobials from plants, rate of extraction, ease of removal, and toxicity in bioassay.
“[11] examined a variety of extractants for their ability to solubilize antimicrobials from plants, rate of extraction, ease of removal, toxicity in bioassay and acetone received the highest overall rating.”
From Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management (2012) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ncube, N. S., Afolayan, A. J., & Okoh, A. I. (2008) · African Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.5897/ajb07.613 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management
Gurjar, M. S., Ali, S., Akhtar, M., & Singh, K. S. (2012) · Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.4236/as.2012.33050 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
“[11] examined a variety of extractants for their ability to solubilize antimicrobials from plants, rate of extraction, ease of removal, toxicity in bioassay and acetone received the highest overall rating.”
BackgroundKadam, S., O'Donnell, C., Rai, D., Hossain, M., Burgess, C., Walsh, D., & Tiwari, B. (2015) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md13074270 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
THE USE OF PLANTS TO PROTECT PLANTS AND FOOD AGAINST FUNGAL PATHOGENS: A REVIEW
Shuping, D. S. S., & Eloff, J. N. (2017) · African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines · doi:10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.14 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationLourens, A. C. U., Reddy, D., Başer, K. H. C., Viljoen, A. M., & Van Vuuren, S. F. (2004) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.07.027 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Blechnum Orientale Linn - a fern with potential as antioxidant, anticancer and antibacterial agent
Lai, H. Y., Lim, Y. Y., & Kim, K. H. (2010) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-10-15 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Kamatou, G. P. P., van Zyl, R. L., van Vuuren, S. F., Viljoen, A. M., Figueiredo, A. C., Barroso, J. G., Pedro, L. G., & Tilney, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Essential Oil Research · doi:10.1080/10412905.2006.12067125 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Antimicrobial compounds from Alpinia conchigera
Aziz, A. N., Ibrahim, H., Rosmy Syamsir, D., Mohtar, M., Vejayan, J., & Awang, K. (2013) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.024 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Zhang, T., & Chen, W. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18091858 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eloff, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Eloff, J.
- ORCID
- Eloff, J.
- Venue
- Planta Medica
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 711-713
- ISSN
- 0032-0943 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0221
- OpenAlex
- W2015884448
- Cited by
- 2,332
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 117
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Planta Medica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- minimum inhibitory concentration, plant extracts, antimicrobial activity, microplate assay, 96-well plate, Staphylococcus aureus, Combretum molle, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, bioassay-guided isolation
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Plant Extracts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review