Cited by 65Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical EducationNursing Roles and Practices

Living with chronic illness: A phenomenological study of the health effects of the patient–provider relationship

Fox, Sylvia, Chesla, Catherine·2008·Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the patient–healthcare provider (HCP) relationship from the lived experience of women with chronic disease and determine how this relationship affects women’s health. Data sources: Narrative accounts of 25 women’s relationships with HCPs in repeated group and individual interviews were audio‐taped and transcribed verbatim. Interpretive phenomenology was used to explore the data using three interconnected modes of paradigm cases, exemplars, and themes. Conclusions: Women with chronic disease believed their health was significantly affected by their relationships with HCPs. They experienced a greater sense of well‐being and security in connected relationships and had more confidence and motivation to manage their illness. Implications for practice: This research suggests that for women with chronic disease, relationships with HCPs that are connected, and characterized by partnership, and personableness result in the women feeling better in many dimensions. The context of today’s healthcare system often pushes the nurse practitioner (NP) to provide care more attuned to medical issues, leaving little time for the development of connected relationships. In spite of this pressure, NPs need to strive to develop relationships with patients that are intersubjective/connected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00295.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Fox, S., & Chesla, C.
Affiliations
  • Samuel Merritt University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
109-117
ISSN
  • 1041-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-7599
OpenAlex
W1968921756
Cited by
65
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
patient-provider relationship, chronic disease, women's health, lived experience, nurse practitioners, partnership, well-being, illness self-management, healthcare system pressure
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Cooperative Behavior, Empathy, Female, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nurse Practitioners, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Support, Women, Nursing Methodology Research, Women's Health, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review